PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FHCCX vs. FIKCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FHCCX vs. FIKCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class C (FHCCX) and Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class Z (FIKCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FHCCX achieves a -5.48% return, which is significantly lower than FIKCX's -5.03% return.


FHCCX

1D
-1.83%
1M
-1.14%
YTD
-5.48%
6M
-22.16%
1Y
-5.48%
3Y*
-2.55%
5Y*
-2.61%
10Y*
5.39%

FIKCX

1D
-1.80%
1M
-1.03%
YTD
-5.03%
6M
-6.12%
1Y
14.62%
3Y*
1.21%
5Y*
0.08%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FHCCX vs. FIKCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FHCCX
Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class C
-5.48%-5.49%3.20%3.02%-13.72%10.43%20.15%26.96%-11.29%
FIKCX
Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class Z
-5.03%14.61%-5.73%4.20%-12.74%11.66%21.55%28.39%-11.04%

Correlation

The correlation between FHCCX and FIKCX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2018

1.00

The correlation between FHCCX and FIKCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FHCCX vs. FIKCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FHCCX
FHCCX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
FHCCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHCCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHCCX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
FHCCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHCCX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

FIKCX
FIKCX Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
FIKCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIKCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIKCX Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
FIKCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIKCX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FHCCX vs. FIKCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class C (FHCCX) and Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class Z (FIKCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FHCCXFIKCXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.22

0.95

-1.17

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.12

1.49

-1.61

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

1.17

-0.19

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.19

1.13

-1.32

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.36

3.08

-3.44

FHCCX vs. FIKCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHCCX Sharpe Ratio is -0.22, which is lower than the FIKCX Sharpe Ratio of 0.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHCCX and FIKCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FHCCXFIKCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.22

0.95

-1.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.13

0.00

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.25

+0.21

Drawdowns

FHCCX vs. FIKCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHCCX drawdown since its inception was -45.28%, which is greater than FIKCX's maximum drawdown of -29.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHCCX and FIKCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FHCCXFIKCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.28%

-29.19%

-16.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.25%

-13.35%

-13.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.25%

-25.31%

-1.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.67%

-29.19%

-0.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.77%

-10.86%

-12.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.19%

-9.27%

-0.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.26%

4.89%

+9.37%

Volatility

FHCCX vs. FIKCX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class C (FHCCX) and Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class Z (FIKCX) have volatilities of 5.07% and 5.08%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FHCCXFIKCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.07%

5.08%

-0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.60%

12.10%

+10.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.64%

15.84%

+7.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.54%

18.37%

+1.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.57%

20.29%

-0.72%

FHCCX vs. FIKCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FHCCX has a 1.72% expense ratio, which is higher than FIKCX's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

FHCCX vs. FIKCX - Dividend Comparison

FHCCX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FIKCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.09%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FHCCX
Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class C
0.00%0.00%17.59%0.00%0.00%8.32%6.85%0.41%6.43%0.00%0.00%7.84%
FIKCX
Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class Z
12.09%11.48%0.00%0.00%0.00%5.71%5.86%0.61%4.65%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, FHCCX and FIKCX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FIKCX has higher volatility (5.08%) compared to FHCCX (5.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHCCX dropped -45.28% vs FIKCX's -29.19%.

FIKCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.95 vs -0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FHCCX and FIKCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer