PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FHASX vs. PLTZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FHASX vs. PLTZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom Blend 2035 Fund (FHASX) and Principal LifeTime 2060 Fund (PLTZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FHASX having a 10.16% return and PLTZX slightly lower at 9.67%.


FHASX

1D
0.55%
1M
4.01%
YTD
10.16%
6M
11.09%
1Y
23.48%
3Y*
16.89%
5Y*
8.10%
10Y*

PLTZX

1D
0.44%
1M
4.72%
YTD
9.67%
6M
10.04%
1Y
22.84%
3Y*
18.70%
5Y*
9.32%
10Y*
11.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FHASX vs. PLTZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FHASX
Fidelity Freedom Blend 2035 Fund
10.16%18.32%13.29%17.57%-18.33%14.11%16.71%25.44%-13.80%
PLTZX
Principal LifeTime 2060 Fund
9.67%17.76%16.89%20.36%-18.81%18.12%16.60%27.54%-13.85%

Correlation

The correlation between FHASX and PLTZX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2018

0.95

The correlation between FHASX and PLTZX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FHASX vs. PLTZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FHASX
FHASX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
FHASX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHASX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHASX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
FHASX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHASX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

PLTZX
PLTZX Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
PLTZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLTZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLTZX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
PLTZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLTZX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FHASX vs. PLTZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom Blend 2035 Fund (FHASX) and Principal LifeTime 2060 Fund (PLTZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FHASXPLTZXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.37

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.20

2.68

+0.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.93

12.08

+1.85

FHASX vs. PLTZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHASX Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is comparable to the PLTZX Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHASX and PLTZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FHASXPLTZXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.47

1.98

+0.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

0.61

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.70

-0.04

Drawdowns

FHASX vs. PLTZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHASX drawdown since its inception was -29.13%, smaller than the maximum PLTZX drawdown of -34.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHASX and PLTZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FHASXPLTZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.13%

-34.01%

+4.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.43%

-8.70%

+1.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.66%

-15.73%

+4.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.40%

-26.79%

+0.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.79%

-4.63%

-1.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.70%

1.93%

-0.23%

Volatility

FHASX vs. PLTZX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Freedom Blend 2035 Fund (FHASX) and Principal LifeTime 2060 Fund (PLTZX) have volatilities of 3.38% and 3.30%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FHASXPLTZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.38%

3.30%

+0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.91%

9.44%

-1.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.63%

11.80%

-2.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.51%

15.46%

-2.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.72%

15.99%

-1.27%

FHASX vs. PLTZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FHASX has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than PLTZX's 0.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

FHASX vs. PLTZX - Dividend Comparison

FHASX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.54%, less than PLTZX's 7.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FHASX
Fidelity Freedom Blend 2035 Fund
3.54%2.95%4.66%2.04%5.70%7.94%4.87%3.48%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PLTZX
Principal LifeTime 2060 Fund
7.60%8.33%7.85%4.12%8.44%5.29%3.60%5.86%5.75%2.73%3.48%3.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, FHASX and PLTZX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FHASX has higher volatility (3.38%) compared to PLTZX (3.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHASX dropped -29.13% vs PLTZX's -34.01%.

FHASX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FHASX and PLTZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer