PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FHAQX vs. TRRKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FHAQX vs. TRRKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom Blend 2045 Fund (FHAQX) and T. Rowe Price Retirement 2045 Fund - Investor Class (TRRKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FHAQX achieves a 12.15% return, which is significantly higher than TRRKX's 10.78% return.


FHAQX

1D
0.43%
1M
-0.60%
6M
7.75%
YTD
12.15%
1Y
24.46%
3Y*
17.53%
5Y*
9.52%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
10.79%

TRRKX

1D
0.28%
1M
0.21%
6M
6.63%
YTD
10.78%
1Y
17.48%
3Y*
14.44%
5Y*
7.50%
10Y*
10.76%
ALL TIME*
8.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FHAQX vs. TRRKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FHAQX
Fidelity Freedom Blend 2045 Fund
12.15%22.54%13.58%20.50%-19.03%16.23%17.77%26.42%-14.60%
TRRKX
T. Rowe Price Retirement 2045 Fund - Investor Class
10.78%14.20%13.94%20.52%-19.03%15.80%18.64%25.41%-11.68%

Correlation

The correlation between FHAQX and TRRKX is 0.95, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2018

0.96

The correlation between FHAQX and TRRKX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FHAQX vs. TRRKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FHAQX
FHAQX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
FHAQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHAQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHAQX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
FHAQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHAQX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

TRRKX
TRRKX Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
TRRKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRRKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRRKX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
TRRKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRRKX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FHAQX vs. TRRKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom Blend 2045 Fund (FHAQX) and T. Rowe Price Retirement 2045 Fund - Investor Class (TRRKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FHAQXTRRKXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.24

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.46

1.76

+0.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.25

7.13

+3.12

FHAQX vs. TRRKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHAQX Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is higher than the TRRKX Sharpe Ratio of 1.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHAQX and TRRKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FHAQX vs. TRRKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHAQX drawdown since its inception was -31.34%, smaller than the maximum TRRKX drawdown of -53.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHAQX and TRRKX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FHAQXTRRKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.34%

-53.54%

+22.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.43%

-9.49%

+0.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.55%

-15.16%

-0.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.79%

-28.75%

+0.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.79%

-0.67%

-1.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.99%

-7.17%

+1.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.26%

2.32%

-0.06%

Volatility

FHAQX vs. TRRKX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Freedom Blend 2045 Fund (FHAQX) has a higher volatility of 4.21% compared to T. Rowe Price Retirement 2045 Fund - Investor Class (TRRKX) at 3.32%. This indicates that FHAQX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TRRKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FHAQXTRRKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.21%

3.32%

+0.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.91%

10.61%

+1.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.97%

13.06%

+0.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.29%

15.04%

+0.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.92%

15.28%

+1.64%

FHAQX vs. TRRKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FHAQX has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than TRRKX's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

FHAQX vs. TRRKX - Dividend Comparison

FHAQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.57%, while TRRKX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FHAQX
Fidelity Freedom Blend 2045 Fund
3.57%2.64%2.34%1.89%6.27%8.65%4.90%3.32%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TRRKX
T. Rowe Price Retirement 2045 Fund - Investor Class
0.00%0.00%1.96%4.40%7.83%5.58%4.52%5.94%8.98%3.52%3.20%4.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, FHAQX and TRRKX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FHAQX has higher volatility (4.21%) compared to TRRKX (3.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHAQX dropped -31.34% vs TRRKX's -53.54%.

FHAQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FHAQX and TRRKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer