PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FHAQX vs. FFFGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FHAQX vs. FFFGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom Blend 2045 Fund (FHAQX) and Fidelity Freedom 2045 Fund (FFFGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FHAQX having a 13.92% return and FFFGX slightly higher at 14.17%.


FHAQX

1D
-0.24%
1M
2.89%
YTD
13.92%
6M
13.37%
1Y
29.83%
3Y*
19.95%
5Y*
10.05%
10Y*

FFFGX

1D
-0.28%
1M
2.94%
YTD
14.17%
6M
13.69%
1Y
30.61%
3Y*
20.62%
5Y*
10.50%
10Y*
12.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FHAQX vs. FFFGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FHAQX
Fidelity Freedom Blend 2045 Fund
13.92%22.54%13.58%20.50%-19.03%16.23%17.77%26.42%-14.60%
FFFGX
Fidelity Freedom 2045 Fund
14.17%23.77%13.95%20.56%-18.29%16.55%18.22%25.41%-12.63%

Correlation

The correlation between FHAQX and FFFGX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2018

0.99

The correlation between FHAQX and FFFGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FHAQX vs. FFFGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FHAQX
FHAQX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
FHAQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHAQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHAQX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
FHAQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHAQX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

FFFGX
FFFGX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
FFFGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFFGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFFGX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
FFFGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFFGX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FHAQX vs. FFFGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom Blend 2045 Fund (FHAQX) and Fidelity Freedom 2045 Fund (FFFGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FHAQXFFFGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.44

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.28

3.31

-0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.21

14.40

-0.19

FHAQX vs. FFFGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHAQX Sharpe Ratio is 2.32, which is comparable to the FFFGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHAQX and FFFGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FHAQX vs. FFFGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHAQX drawdown since its inception was -31.34%, smaller than the maximum FFFGX drawdown of -54.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHAQX and FFFGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FHAQXFFFGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.34%

-54.61%

+23.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.43%

-9.57%

+0.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.55%

-15.42%

-0.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.79%

-27.33%

-0.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.24%

-0.28%

+0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.05%

-8.34%

+2.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.17%

2.20%

-0.03%

Volatility

FHAQX vs. FFFGX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Freedom Blend 2045 Fund (FHAQX) and Fidelity Freedom 2045 Fund (FFFGX) have volatilities of 5.50% and 5.49%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FHAQXFFFGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.50%

5.49%

+0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.21%

11.33%

-0.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.36%

13.43%

-0.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.22%

15.13%

+0.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.95%

15.42%

+1.53%

FHAQX vs. FFFGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FHAQX has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than FFFGX's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

FHAQX vs. FFFGX - Dividend Comparison

FHAQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.52%, less than FFFGX's 5.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFFGX
Fidelity Freedom 2045 Fund
5.76%4.40%1.97%1.84%12.04%12.00%4.99%6.51%7.82%4.01%4.15%4.07%
FHAQX
Fidelity Freedom Blend 2045 Fund
3.52%2.64%2.34%1.89%6.27%8.65%4.90%3.32%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, FHAQX and FFFGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FHAQX has higher volatility (5.50%) compared to FFFGX (5.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHAQX dropped -31.34% vs FFFGX's -54.61%.

FFFGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 2.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FHAQX and FFFGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer