PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FHAPX vs. FRQHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FHAPX vs. FRQHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom Blend 2050 Fund (FHAPX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6 (FRQHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FHAPX achieves a 13.68% return, which is significantly higher than FRQHX's 4.14% return.


FHAPX

1D
0.66%
1M
5.28%
YTD
13.68%
6M
15.12%
1Y
30.71%
3Y*
21.06%
5Y*
10.61%
10Y*

FRQHX

1D
0.21%
1M
1.55%
YTD
4.14%
6M
4.39%
1Y
10.64%
3Y*
7.87%
5Y*
3.09%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FHAPX vs. FRQHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FHAPX
Fidelity Freedom Blend 2050 Fund
13.68%22.63%16.27%20.48%-19.04%16.29%17.82%9.58%
FRQHX
Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6
4.14%10.01%4.68%8.75%-12.22%4.04%9.80%3.95%

Correlation

The correlation between FHAPX and FRQHX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2019

0.80

The correlation between FHAPX and FRQHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FHAPX vs. FRQHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FHAPX
FHAPX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
FHAPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHAPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHAPX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
FHAPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHAPX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

FRQHX
FRQHX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
FRQHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRQHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRQHX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
FRQHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRQHX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FHAPX vs. FRQHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom Blend 2050 Fund (FHAPX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6 (FRQHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FHAPXFRQHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.52

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.24

3.16

+0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.35

13.43

+0.92

FHAPX vs. FRQHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHAPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is comparable to the FRQHX Sharpe Ratio of 2.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHAPX and FRQHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FHAPXFRQHXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.48

2.60

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

0.56

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

0.80

-0.12

Drawdowns

FHAPX vs. FRQHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHAPX drawdown since its inception was -31.30%, which is greater than FRQHX's maximum drawdown of -16.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHAPX and FRQHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FHAPXFRQHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.30%

-16.90%

-14.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.62%

-3.41%

-6.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.51%

-5.15%

-10.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.81%

-16.90%

-10.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.12%

-3.79%

-2.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.17%

0.80%

+1.37%

Volatility

FHAPX vs. FRQHX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Freedom Blend 2050 Fund (FHAPX) has a higher volatility of 4.14% compared to Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6 (FRQHX) at 1.66%. This indicates that FHAPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRQHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FHAPXFRQHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.14%

1.66%

+2.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.28%

3.41%

+6.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.56%

4.14%

+8.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.08%

5.56%

+9.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.92%

5.76%

+11.16%

FHAPX vs. FRQHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FHAPX has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than FRQHX's 0.26% expense ratio.


Dividends

FHAPX vs. FRQHX - Dividend Comparison

FHAPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.28%, which matches FRQHX's 3.29% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
FHAPX
Fidelity Freedom Blend 2050 Fund
3.28%2.47%4.84%1.86%6.21%8.52%4.82%3.28%
FRQHX
Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6
3.29%3.20%3.20%2.95%5.25%6.22%3.70%2.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


FHAPX and FRQHX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FHAPX has higher volatility (4.14%) compared to FRQHX (1.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHAPX dropped -31.30% vs FRQHX's -16.90%.

FRQHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs 2.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FHAPX and FRQHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer