PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FHAEX vs. FRQHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FHAEX vs. FRQHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom Blend 2030 Fund Class K (FHAEX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6 (FRQHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FHAEX achieves a 9.05% return, which is significantly higher than FRQHX's 4.14% return.


FHAEX

1D
0.44%
1M
3.53%
YTD
9.05%
6M
9.84%
1Y
21.24%
3Y*
15.07%
5Y*
6.97%
10Y*

FRQHX

1D
0.21%
1M
1.55%
YTD
4.14%
6M
4.39%
1Y
10.64%
3Y*
7.87%
5Y*
3.09%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FHAEX vs. FRQHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FHAEX
Fidelity Freedom Blend 2030 Fund Class K
9.05%17.00%11.31%15.41%-17.42%11.19%15.38%7.73%
FRQHX
Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6
4.14%10.01%4.68%8.75%-12.22%4.04%9.80%3.95%

Correlation

The correlation between FHAEX and FRQHX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2019

0.89

The correlation between FHAEX and FRQHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FHAEX vs. FRQHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FHAEX
FHAEX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
FHAEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHAEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHAEX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
FHAEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHAEX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

FRQHX
FRQHX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
FRQHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRQHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRQHX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
FRQHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRQHX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FHAEX vs. FRQHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom Blend 2030 Fund Class K (FHAEX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6 (FRQHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FHAEXFRQHXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.48

2.60

-0.12

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.52

3.84

-0.32

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.52

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.17

3.16

+0.01

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.70

13.43

+0.27

FHAEX vs. FRQHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHAEX Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is comparable to the FRQHX Sharpe Ratio of 2.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHAEX and FRQHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FHAEXFRQHXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.48

2.60

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

0.56

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.74

0.80

-0.06

Drawdowns

FHAEX vs. FRQHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHAEX drawdown since its inception was -24.60%, which is greater than FRQHX's maximum drawdown of -16.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHAEX and FRQHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FHAEXFRQHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.60%

-16.90%

-7.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.80%

-3.41%

-3.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.07%

-5.15%

-4.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.57%

-16.90%

-7.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.18%

-3.79%

-1.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.57%

0.80%

+0.77%

Volatility

FHAEX vs. FRQHX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Freedom Blend 2030 Fund Class K (FHAEX) has a higher volatility of 3.16% compared to Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6 (FRQHX) at 1.66%. This indicates that FHAEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRQHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FHAEXFRQHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.16%

1.66%

+1.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.18%

3.41%

+3.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.70%

4.14%

+4.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.86%

5.56%

+5.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.35%

5.76%

+6.59%

FHAEX vs. FRQHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FHAEX has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than FRQHX's 0.26% expense ratio.


Dividends

FHAEX vs. FRQHX - Dividend Comparison

FHAEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.63%, more than FRQHX's 3.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
FHAEX
Fidelity Freedom Blend 2030 Fund Class K
3.63%3.00%4.30%2.27%5.43%7.17%4.57%3.41%2.92%
FRQHX
Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6
3.29%3.20%3.20%2.95%5.25%6.22%3.70%2.57%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, FHAEX and FRQHX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FHAEX has higher volatility (3.16%) compared to FRQHX (1.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHAEX dropped -24.60% vs FRQHX's -16.90%.

FRQHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs 2.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FHAEX and FRQHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer