FGWMX vs. EELDX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FGWMX (Fidelity Advisor New Markets Income Fund Class M) and EELDX (Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund) are both Emerging Markets Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, FGWMX returned 3.58%/yr vs 8.09%/yr for EELDX. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FGWMX charges 1.13%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for EELDX.

Performance

FGWMX vs. EELDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor New Markets Income Fund Class M (FGWMX) and Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund (EELDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGWMX achieves a 3.83% return, which is significantly lower than EELDX's 6.66% return.

FGWMX

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: 0.96%
• YTD: 3.83%
• 6M: 4.28%
• 1Y: 15.56%
• 3Y*: 12.58%
• 5Y*: 3.58%
• 10Y*: —

EELDX

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: 1.02%
• YTD: 6.66%
• 6M: 8.15%
• 1Y: 19.13%
• 3Y*: 15.14%
• 5Y*: 8.09%
• 10Y*: 7.99%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGWMX vs. EELDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FGWMX Fidelity Advisor New Markets Income Fund Class M	3.83%	14.45%	6.57%	13.55%	-16.26%	-2.61%	4.21%	10.65%	0.12%
EELDX Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund	6.66%	15.80%	14.87%	11.46%	-6.14%	1.55%	7.44%	18.34%	-0.22%

Correlation

The correlation between FGWMX and EELDX is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.57
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.48
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.49
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2018	0.52

The correlation between FGWMX and EELDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FGWMX vs. EELDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGWMX

FGWMX Risk / Return Rank: 93
FGWMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
FGWMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
FGWMX Omega Ratio Rank: 95
FGWMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
FGWMX Martin Ratio Rank: 90

EELDX

EELDX Risk / Return Rank: 97
EELDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
EELDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
EELDX Omega Ratio Rank: 98
EELDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
EELDX Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGWMX vs. EELDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor New Markets Income Fund Class M (FGWMX) and Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund (EELDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FGWMX	EELDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.69	5.55	-1.86
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	6.10	8.56	-2.46
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.79	2.49	-0.69
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.23	5.22	-0.99
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.30	21.28	-2.98
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FGWMX vs. EELDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGWMX Sharpe Ratio is 3.69, which is lower than the EELDX Sharpe Ratio of 5.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGWMX and EELDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FGWMX	EELDX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.69	5.55	-1.86
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.55	1.76	-1.22
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	1.69	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.57	1.39	-0.82

Drawdowns

FGWMX vs. EELDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGWMX drawdown since its inception was -27.35%, which is greater than EELDX's maximum drawdown of -19.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGWMX and EELDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FGWMX	EELDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.35%	-19.12%	-8.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.80%	-3.68%	-0.12%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.55%	-3.98%	-2.57%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.35%	-17.35%	-10.00%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-19.12%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.34%	-2.91%	-3.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.88%	0.90%	-0.02%

Volatility

FGWMX vs. EELDX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor New Markets Income Fund Class M (FGWMX) has a higher volatility of 1.51% compared to Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund (EELDX) at 0.63%. This indicates that FGWMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EELDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FGWMX	EELDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.51%	0.63%	+0.88%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.52%	3.04%	+0.48%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.36%	3.47%	+0.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.60%	4.61%	+1.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.27%	4.74%	+2.53%

FGWMX vs. EELDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGWMX has a 1.13% expense ratio, which is higher than EELDX's 0.78% expense ratio.

Dividends

FGWMX vs. EELDX - Dividend Comparison

FGWMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.60%, less than EELDX's 10.78% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EELDX Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund	10.78%	9.44%	8.58%	9.02%	9.17%	7.87%	7.71%	7.86%	8.16%	7.90%	4.12%	1.65%
FGWMX Fidelity Advisor New Markets Income Fund Class M	4.60%	4.80%	4.42%	4.86%	3.69%	3.21%	3.76%	4.56%	0.40%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FGWMX and EELDX in my portfolio?

FGWMX and EELDX have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FGWMX or EELDX?

FGWMX has higher volatility (1.51%) compared to EELDX (0.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGWMX dropped -27.35% vs EELDX's -19.12%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EELDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.55 vs 3.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.