FGWMX vs. IEMG
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor New Markets Income Fund Class M (FGWMX) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG).
FGWMX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Dec 4, 2018. IEMG is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index. It was launched on Oct 18, 2012.
Performance
FGWMX vs. IEMG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FGWMX vs. IEMG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGWMX Fidelity Advisor New Markets Income Fund Class M | -0.70% | 14.45% | 6.57% | 13.55% | -16.26% | -2.61% | 4.21% | 10.65% | 0.12% |
IEMG iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | 4.55% | 32.56% | 6.50% | 11.52% | -19.98% | -0.64% | 17.87% | 17.81% | -3.12% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FGWMX achieves a -0.70% return, which is significantly lower than IEMG's 4.55% return.
FGWMX
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- -2.93%
- YTD
- -0.70%
- 6M
- 2.77%
- 1Y
- 10.23%
- 3Y*
- 10.68%
- 5Y*
- 3.24%
- 10Y*
- —
IEMG
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- -6.83%
- YTD
- 4.55%
- 6M
- 7.62%
- 1Y
- 33.51%
- 3Y*
- 16.36%
- 5Y*
- 4.53%
- 10Y*
- 8.31%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FGWMX vs. IEMG - Expense Ratio Comparison
FGWMX has a 1.13% expense ratio, which is higher than IEMG's 0.09% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FGWMX vs. IEMG — Risk / Return Rank
FGWMX
IEMG
FGWMX vs. IEMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor New Markets Income Fund Class M (FGWMX) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FGWMX | IEMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.06 | 1.70 | +0.36 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.88 | 2.30 | +0.58 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.34 | +0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.11 | 2.58 | -0.47 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.17 | 9.84 | -0.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FGWMX | IEMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.06 | 1.70 | +0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 0.25 | +0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.42 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.28 | +0.21 |
Correlation
The correlation between FGWMX and IEMG is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
FGWMX vs. IEMG - Dividend Comparison
FGWMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.38%, more than IEMG's 2.63% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGWMX Fidelity Advisor New Markets Income Fund Class M | 4.38% | 4.80% | 4.42% | 4.86% | 3.69% | 3.21% | 3.76% | 4.56% | 0.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IEMG iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | 2.63% | 2.75% | 3.20% | 2.89% | 2.71% | 3.06% | 1.87% | 3.15% | 2.76% | 2.35% | 2.28% | 2.53% |
Drawdowns
FGWMX vs. IEMG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FGWMX drawdown since its inception was -27.35%, smaller than the maximum IEMG drawdown of -38.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGWMX and IEMG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FGWMX | IEMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.35% | -38.71% | +11.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.05% | -13.21% | +8.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.35% | -35.93% | +8.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -38.71% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.52% | -9.40% | +5.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.47% | -13.11% | +6.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.19% | 3.46% | -2.27% |
Volatility
FGWMX vs. IEMG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor New Markets Income Fund Class M (FGWMX) is 1.80%, while iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) has a volatility of 9.35%. This indicates that FGWMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IEMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FGWMX | IEMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.80% | 9.35% | -7.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.97% | 14.68% | -11.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.20% | 19.79% | -14.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.53% | 17.91% | -11.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.30% | 19.84% | -12.54% |