PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FGWMX vs. IEMG
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FGWMX vs. IEMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor New Markets Income Fund Class M (FGWMX) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FGWMX vs. IEMG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FGWMX
Fidelity Advisor New Markets Income Fund Class M
-0.99%14.45%6.57%13.55%-16.26%-2.61%4.21%10.65%0.12%
IEMG
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
3.76%32.56%6.50%11.52%-19.98%-0.64%17.87%17.81%-3.12%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGWMX achieves a -0.99% return, which is significantly lower than IEMG's 3.76% return.


FGWMX

1D
-0.07%
1M
-3.70%
YTD
-0.99%
6M
2.62%
1Y
10.33%
3Y*
10.57%
5Y*
3.25%
10Y*

IEMG

1D
3.61%
1M
-9.13%
YTD
3.76%
6M
7.65%
1Y
33.09%
3Y*
16.07%
5Y*
4.37%
10Y*
8.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FGWMX vs. IEMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGWMX has a 1.13% expense ratio, which is higher than IEMG's 0.09% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FGWMX vs. IEMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGWMX
FGWMX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
FGWMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGWMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGWMX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
FGWMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGWMX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

IEMG
IEMG Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
IEMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEMG Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
IEMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEMG Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGWMX vs. IEMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor New Markets Income Fund Class M (FGWMX) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FGWMXIEMGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.06

1.68

+0.37

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.87

2.27

+0.59

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.34

+0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.04

2.48

-0.44

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.06

9.61

-0.55

FGWMX vs. IEMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGWMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is comparable to the IEMG Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGWMX and IEMG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FGWMXIEMGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.06

1.68

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.25

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.28

+0.21

Correlation

The correlation between FGWMX and IEMG is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

FGWMX vs. IEMG - Dividend Comparison

FGWMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.40%, more than IEMG's 2.65% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FGWMX
Fidelity Advisor New Markets Income Fund Class M
4.40%4.80%4.42%4.86%3.69%3.21%3.76%4.56%0.40%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IEMG
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
2.65%2.75%3.20%2.89%2.71%3.06%1.87%3.15%2.76%2.35%2.28%2.53%

Drawdowns

FGWMX vs. IEMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGWMX drawdown since its inception was -27.35%, smaller than the maximum IEMG drawdown of -38.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGWMX and IEMG.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FGWMXIEMGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.35%

-38.71%

+11.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.20%

-13.21%

+8.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.35%

-35.93%

+8.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.80%

-10.08%

+6.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.47%

-13.11%

+6.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.17%

3.41%

-2.24%

Volatility

FGWMX vs. IEMG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor New Markets Income Fund Class M (FGWMX) is 1.77%, while iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) has a volatility of 10.48%. This indicates that FGWMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IEMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FGWMXIEMGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.77%

10.48%

-8.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.96%

14.67%

-11.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.20%

19.78%

-14.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.53%

17.91%

-11.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.30%

19.84%

-12.54%