EELDX vs. EVCGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund (EELDX) and Eaton Vance Greater China Growth Fund (EVCGX).
EELDX is managed by Eaton Vance. It was launched on Feb 3, 2013. EVCGX is managed by Eaton Vance. It was launched on Oct 27, 1992.
Performance
EELDX vs. EVCGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EELDX vs. EVCGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EELDX Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund | 1.33% | 15.80% | 14.87% | 11.46% | -6.14% | 1.55% | 7.44% | 18.34% | -4.27% | 13.05% |
EVCGX Eaton Vance Greater China Growth Fund | -9.64% | 26.06% | 9.30% | -17.33% | -22.53% | -9.61% | 25.22% | 23.32% | -9.90% | 49.26% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EELDX achieves a 1.33% return, which is significantly higher than EVCGX's -9.64% return. Over the past 10 years, EELDX has outperformed EVCGX with an annualized return of 7.76%, while EVCGX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.66% annualized return.
EELDX
- 1D
- -0.64%
- 1M
- -3.19%
- YTD
- 1.33%
- 6M
- 6.65%
- 1Y
- 15.07%
- 3Y*
- 13.72%
- 5Y*
- 7.74%
- 10Y*
- 7.76%
EVCGX
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- -7.78%
- YTD
- -9.64%
- 6M
- -16.17%
- 1Y
- -0.54%
- 3Y*
- 0.48%
- 5Y*
- -7.00%
- 10Y*
- 4.66%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EELDX vs. EVCGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EELDX has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is lower than EVCGX's 1.53% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EELDX vs. EVCGX — Risk / Return Rank
EELDX
EVCGX
EELDX vs. EVCGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund (EELDX) and Eaton Vance Greater China Growth Fund (EVCGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EELDX | EVCGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.99 | -0.03 | +4.03 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 5.53 | 0.10 | +5.43 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.96 | 1.01 | +0.95 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.75 | -0.14 | +3.89 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.15 | -0.39 | +15.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EELDX | EVCGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.99 | -0.03 | +4.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.70 | -0.27 | +1.97 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.64 | 0.21 | +1.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.31 | 0.23 | +1.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between EELDX and EVCGX is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
EELDX vs. EVCGX - Dividend Comparison
EELDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.20%, more than EVCGX's 1.75% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EELDX Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund | 11.20% | 9.44% | 8.58% | 9.02% | 9.17% | 7.87% | 7.71% | 7.86% | 8.16% | 7.90% | 4.12% | 1.65% |
EVCGX Eaton Vance Greater China Growth Fund | 1.75% | 1.58% | 2.15% | 8.47% | 6.09% | 5.43% | 9.85% | 3.19% | 9.89% | 11.34% | 0.94% | 6.33% |
Drawdowns
EELDX vs. EVCGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EELDX drawdown since its inception was -19.12%, smaller than the maximum EVCGX drawdown of -68.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EELDX and EVCGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EELDX | EVCGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.12% | -68.37% | +49.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.68% | -17.35% | +13.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.35% | -54.46% | +37.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.12% | -56.84% | +37.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.68% | -36.76% | +33.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.94% | -28.03% | +25.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.91% | 6.18% | -5.27% |
Volatility
EELDX vs. EVCGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund (EELDX) is 1.89%, while Eaton Vance Greater China Growth Fund (EVCGX) has a volatility of 6.18%. This indicates that EELDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EVCGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EELDX | EVCGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.89% | 6.18% | -4.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.76% | 13.52% | -10.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.72% | 20.52% | -16.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.59% | 25.56% | -20.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.76% | 22.06% | -17.30% |