FGVMX vs. EDD

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

FGVMX (Fidelity Advisor New Markets Income Fund Class A) and EDD (Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Fund) are both Emerging Markets Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, FGVMX returned 3.13%/yr vs 8.18%/yr for EDD. Their 0.41 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. FGVMX charges 1.13%/yr vs 2.20%/yr for EDD.

Performance

FGVMX vs. EDD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor New Markets Income Fund Class A (FGVMX) and Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Fund (EDD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGVMX achieves a 2.44% return, which is significantly lower than EDD's 14.80% return.

FGVMX

• 1D: -0.29%
• 1M: -1.57%
• 6M: 0.96%
• YTD: 2.44%
• 1Y: 9.85%
• 3Y*: 10.31%
• 5Y*: 3.13%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 3.85%

EDD

• 1D: -0.17%
• 1M: 0.00%
• 6M: 6.55%
• YTD: 14.80%
• 1Y: 27.62%
• 3Y*: 18.63%
• 5Y*: 8.18%
• 10Y*: 5.50%
• ALL TIME*: 2.96%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
EDD Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Fund	$2.10M	$3.03M	$2.42M
FGVMX Fidelity Advisor New Markets Income Fund Class A	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

FGVMX vs. EDD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FGVMX Fidelity Advisor New Markets Income Fund Class A	2.44%	14.54%	6.49%	13.64%	-16.28%	-2.62%	4.21%	10.58%	0.12%
EDD Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Fund	14.80%	32.46%	8.64%	14.09%	-14.15%	-7.03%	-2.84%	25.45%	-4.61%

Correlation

The correlation between FGVMX and EDD is 0.44, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.44
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.38
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.41
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2018	0.41

Return for Risk

FGVMX vs. EDD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FGVMX

FGVMX Risk / Return Rank: 89
FGVMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
FGVMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
FGVMX Omega Ratio Rank: 90
FGVMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
FGVMX Martin Ratio Rank: 86

EDD

EDD Risk / Return Rank: 57
EDD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
EDD Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
EDD Omega Ratio Rank: 69
EDD Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
EDD Martin Ratio Rank: 35

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FGVMX vs. EDD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor New Markets Income Fund Class A (FGVMX) and Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Fund (EDD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FGVMX	EDD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.39	1.66	+0.73
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.89	2.32	+1.57
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	1.29	+0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.76	1.57	+1.19
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.42	5.03	+6.39

FGVMX vs. EDD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGVMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is higher than the EDD Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGVMX and EDD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FGVMX vs. EDD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGVMX drawdown since its inception was -27.36%, smaller than the maximum EDD drawdown of -59.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGVMX and EDD.

Drawdown Indicators

	FGVMX	EDD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.36%	-59.38%	+32.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.80%	-17.67%	+13.87%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.90%	-17.67%	+11.77%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.36%	-32.04%	+4.68%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-42.70%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.90%	-2.84%	+0.94%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.23%	-24.06%	+17.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.92%	5.50%	-4.58%

Volatility

FGVMX vs. EDD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor New Markets Income Fund Class A (FGVMX) is 0.90%, while Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Fund (EDD) has a volatility of 4.62%. This indicates that FGVMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EDD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FGVMX	EDD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.90%	4.62%	-3.72%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.56%	13.86%	-10.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.40%	16.72%	-12.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.62%	15.57%	-8.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.22%	17.66%	-10.44%

FGVMX vs. EDD - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGVMX has a 1.13% expense ratio, which is lower than EDD's 2.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

FGVMX vs. EDD - Dividend Comparison

FGVMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.32%, less than EDD's 10.82% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EDD Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Fund	10.82%	9.76%	11.45%	7.30%	6.82%	6.93%	6.92%	8.15%	9.90%	8.18%	10.32%	12.65%
FGVMX Fidelity Advisor New Markets Income Fund Class A	4.32%	4.80%	4.42%	4.86%	3.68%	3.20%	3.76%	4.56%	0.40%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FGVMX and EDD in my portfolio?

FGVMX and EDD have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FGVMX or EDD?

EDD has higher volatility (4.62%) compared to FGVMX (0.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGVMX dropped -27.36% vs EDD's -59.38%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FGVMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.