PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FGUMX vs. JGH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FGUMX vs. JGH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor High Income Fund Class Z (FGUMX) and Nuveen Global High Income Fund (JGH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGUMX achieves a 3.48% return, which is significantly lower than JGH's 5.15% return.


FGUMX

1D
-0.24%
1M
0.63%
YTD
3.48%
6M
4.20%
1Y
9.97%
3Y*
10.21%
5Y*
4.38%
10Y*

JGH

1D
-0.08%
1M
0.82%
YTD
5.15%
6M
7.13%
1Y
10.84%
3Y*
15.83%
5Y*
5.81%
10Y*
8.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGUMX vs. JGH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FGUMX
Fidelity Advisor High Income Fund Class Z
3.48%9.92%9.53%11.08%-13.03%3.72%2.41%14.34%-3.08%
JGH
Nuveen Global High Income Fund
5.15%8.62%15.98%20.89%-21.01%10.84%2.77%30.04%-4.36%

Correlation

The correlation between FGUMX and JGH is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2018

0.47

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FGUMX vs. JGH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGUMX
FGUMX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
FGUMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGUMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGUMX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
FGUMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGUMX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

JGH
JGH Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
JGH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JGH Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
JGH Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
JGH Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
JGH Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGUMX vs. JGH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor High Income Fund Class Z (FGUMX) and Nuveen Global High Income Fund (JGH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FGUMXJGHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.70

1.22

+0.48

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.65

1.30

+3.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

22.17

3.16

+19.01

FGUMX vs. JGH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGUMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.99, which is higher than the JGH Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGUMX and JGH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FGUMXJGHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.99

1.06

+1.92

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

0.42

+0.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

0.41

+0.34

Drawdowns

FGUMX vs. JGH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGUMX drawdown since its inception was -22.36%, smaller than the maximum JGH drawdown of -43.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGUMX and JGH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FGUMXJGHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.36%

-43.79%

+21.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.21%

-8.37%

+6.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.15%

-13.70%

+9.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.53%

-28.66%

+12.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.24%

-0.78%

+0.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.49%

-7.00%

+3.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.46%

3.44%

-2.98%

Volatility

FGUMX vs. JGH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor High Income Fund Class Z (FGUMX) is 1.19%, while Nuveen Global High Income Fund (JGH) has a volatility of 3.70%. This indicates that FGUMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JGH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FGUMXJGHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.19%

3.70%

-2.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.69%

7.25%

-4.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.55%

10.22%

-6.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.34%

13.79%

-8.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.38%

15.88%

-9.50%

FGUMX vs. JGH - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGUMX has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than JGH's 1.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

FGUMX vs. JGH - Dividend Comparison

FGUMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.45%, less than JGH's 9.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FGUMX
Fidelity Advisor High Income Fund Class Z
6.45%6.49%6.19%5.48%3.98%4.12%4.78%5.17%0.44%0.00%0.00%0.00%
JGH
Nuveen Global High Income Fund
9.74%9.82%9.67%10.18%12.05%8.19%7.13%7.53%9.88%8.52%9.61%11.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


FGUMX and JGH have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JGH has higher volatility (3.70%) compared to FGUMX (1.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGUMX dropped -22.36% vs JGH's -43.79%.

FGUMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.99 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FGUMX and JGH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer