FGTMX vs. FQTIX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

FGTMX (Fidelity Advisor High Income Fund Class I) and FQTIX (Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I) are both High Yield Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, FGTMX returned 4.31%/yr vs 3.70%/yr for FQTIX. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FGTMX charges 0.72%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for FQTIX.

Performance

FGTMX vs. FQTIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor High Income Fund Class I (FGTMX) and Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I (FQTIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FGTMX having a 3.43% return and FQTIX slightly lower at 3.30%.

FGTMX

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: 0.75%
• YTD: 3.43%
• 6M: 4.28%
• 1Y: 9.99%
• 3Y*: 10.11%
• 5Y*: 4.31%
• 10Y*: —

FQTIX

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: 0.37%
• YTD: 3.30%
• 6M: 3.92%
• 1Y: 8.87%
• 3Y*: 8.60%
• 5Y*: 3.70%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGTMX vs. FQTIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
FGTMX Fidelity Advisor High Income Fund Class I	3.43%	9.80%	9.38%	11.04%	-13.18%	3.85%	2.31%	6.26%
FQTIX Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I	3.30%	7.51%	8.03%	13.44%	-14.39%	8.51%	3.68%	4.11%

Correlation

The correlation between FGTMX and FQTIX is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.69
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.72
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.79
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2019	0.76

The correlation between FGTMX and FQTIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.79 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FGTMX vs. FQTIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGTMX

FGTMX Risk / Return Rank: 93
FGTMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
FGTMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
FGTMX Omega Ratio Rank: 93
FGTMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
FGTMX Martin Ratio Rank: 95

FQTIX

FQTIX Risk / Return Rank: 91
FQTIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
FQTIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
FQTIX Omega Ratio Rank: 91
FQTIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
FQTIX Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGTMX vs. FQTIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor High Income Fund Class I (FGTMX) and Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I (FQTIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FGTMX	FQTIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.05	3.02	+0.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	5.19	4.56	+0.63
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.73	1.67	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.36	4.26	+0.10
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	21.68	22.37	-0.69
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FGTMX vs. FQTIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGTMX Sharpe Ratio is 3.05, which is comparable to the FQTIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGTMX and FQTIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FGTMX	FQTIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.05	3.02	+0.03
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.80	0.63	+0.18
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.73	0.59	+0.14

Drawdowns

FGTMX vs. FQTIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGTMX drawdown since its inception was -22.37%, smaller than the maximum FQTIX drawdown of -24.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGTMX and FQTIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FGTMX	FQTIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.37%	-24.62%	+2.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.33%	-2.20%	-0.13%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.15%	-6.42%	+2.27%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.56%	-18.81%	+2.25%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.12%	-0.24%	+0.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.55%	-4.32%	+0.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.47%	0.42%	+0.05%

Volatility

FGTMX vs. FQTIX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor High Income Fund Class I (FGTMX) has a higher volatility of 0.92% compared to Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I (FQTIX) at 0.81%. This indicates that FGTMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FQTIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FGTMX	FQTIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.92%	0.81%	+0.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.54%	2.38%	+0.16%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.45%	3.10%	+0.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.39%	5.94%	-0.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.40%	7.72%	-1.32%

FGTMX vs. FQTIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGTMX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than FQTIX's 0.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

FGTMX vs. FQTIX - Dividend Comparison

FGTMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.34%, less than FQTIX's 6.86% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FGTMX Fidelity Advisor High Income Fund Class I	6.34%	6.38%	6.06%	5.32%	3.91%	4.13%	4.68%	5.05%	0.44%
FQTIX Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I	6.86%	5.70%	7.86%	7.64%	8.10%	7.15%	6.89%	5.63%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FGTMX and FQTIX in my portfolio?

FGTMX and FQTIX have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FGTMX or FQTIX?

FGTMX has higher volatility (0.92%) compared to FQTIX (0.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGTMX dropped -22.37% vs FQTIX's -24.62%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FGTMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.05 vs 3.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.