FGTIX vs. AAAAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Franklin Growth Allocation Fund (FGTIX) and DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund - Class A (AAAAX).
FGTIX is managed by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Dec 30, 1996. AAAAX is managed by DWS. It was launched on Jul 30, 2007.
Performance
FGTIX vs. AAAAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FGTIX vs. AAAAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGTIX Franklin Growth Allocation Fund | -4.56% | 17.82% | 15.13% | 17.62% | -17.12% | 16.39% | 14.54% | 21.85% | -6.45% | 18.06% |
AAAAX DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund - Class A | 8.59% | 12.82% | 5.24% | 2.30% | -9.91% | 23.45% | 3.71% | 21.42% | -5.36% | 14.67% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FGTIX achieves a -4.56% return, which is significantly lower than AAAAX's 8.59% return. Over the past 10 years, FGTIX has outperformed AAAAX with an annualized return of 9.11%, while AAAAX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.28% annualized return.
FGTIX
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- -7.42%
- YTD
- -4.56%
- 6M
- -1.79%
- 1Y
- 13.57%
- 3Y*
- 12.93%
- 5Y*
- 7.20%
- 10Y*
- 9.11%
AAAAX
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- -4.37%
- YTD
- 8.59%
- 6M
- 10.72%
- 1Y
- 16.80%
- 3Y*
- 9.80%
- 5Y*
- 6.74%
- 10Y*
- 7.28%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FGTIX vs. AAAAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FGTIX has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is lower than AAAAX's 1.22% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FGTIX vs. AAAAX — Risk / Return Rank
FGTIX
AAAAX
FGTIX vs. AAAAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Growth Allocation Fund (FGTIX) and DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund - Class A (AAAAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FGTIX | AAAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.02 | 1.49 | -0.47 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.53 | 2.00 | -0.47 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.30 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.22 | 1.80 | -0.58 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.85 | 9.69 | -3.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FGTIX | AAAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.02 | 1.49 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | 0.56 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 | 0.58 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.38 | +0.12 |
Correlation
The correlation between FGTIX and AAAAX is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FGTIX vs. AAAAX - Dividend Comparison
FGTIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.41%, more than AAAAX's 3.26% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGTIX Franklin Growth Allocation Fund | 9.41% | 8.98% | 2.27% | 3.28% | 4.93% | 14.27% | 5.11% | 11.14% | 9.45% | 6.22% | 2.70% | 6.36% |
AAAAX DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund - Class A | 3.26% | 3.54% | 2.45% | 2.08% | 4.17% | 2.31% | 1.33% | 1.81% | 1.61% | 1.52% | 1.47% | 2.15% |
Drawdowns
FGTIX vs. AAAAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FGTIX drawdown since its inception was -46.40%, which is greater than AAAAX's maximum drawdown of -40.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGTIX and AAAAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FGTIX | AAAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.40% | -40.47% | -5.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.08% | -9.55% | -0.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.56% | -22.62% | -8.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.56% | -29.41% | -2.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.16% | -4.57% | -3.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.21% | -6.89% | -3.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.10% | 1.77% | +0.33% |
Volatility
FGTIX vs. AAAAX - Volatility Comparison
Franklin Growth Allocation Fund (FGTIX) has a higher volatility of 4.16% compared to DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund - Class A (AAAAX) at 3.03%. This indicates that FGTIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAAAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FGTIX | AAAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.16% | 3.03% | +1.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.83% | 7.22% | +0.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.73% | 11.60% | +2.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.95% | 12.18% | +2.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.81% | 12.66% | +1.15% |