PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FGTAX vs. SPIAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FGTAX vs. SPIAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class A (FGTAX) and Invesco S&P 500 Index A (SPIAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGTAX achieves a 10.34% return, which is significantly lower than SPIAX's 11.48% return. Over the past 10 years, FGTAX has outperformed SPIAX with an annualized return of 16.25%, while SPIAX has yielded a comparatively lower 15.05% annualized return.


FGTAX

1D
-0.32%
1M
3.36%
YTD
10.34%
6M
12.25%
1Y
30.98%
3Y*
25.22%
5Y*
15.99%
10Y*
16.25%

SPIAX

1D
0.13%
1M
5.76%
YTD
11.48%
6M
11.48%
1Y
28.36%
3Y*
22.11%
5Y*
13.68%
10Y*
15.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGTAX vs. SPIAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FGTAX
Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class A
10.34%26.58%25.62%26.18%-9.26%25.98%12.59%30.74%-7.68%17.54%
SPIAX
Invesco S&P 500 Index A
11.48%17.23%24.34%25.63%-18.56%27.99%17.84%30.78%-4.97%21.13%

Correlation

The correlation between FGTAX and SPIAX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 8, 2008

0.96

The correlation between FGTAX and SPIAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FGTAX vs. SPIAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGTAX
FGTAX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
FGTAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGTAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGTAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
FGTAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGTAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

SPIAX
SPIAX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
SPIAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPIAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPIAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
SPIAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPIAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGTAX vs. SPIAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class A (FGTAX) and Invesco S&P 500 Index A (SPIAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FGTAXSPIAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.45

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.53

3.27

+0.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.97

15.21

+0.76

FGTAX vs. SPIAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGTAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.67, which is comparable to the SPIAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGTAX and SPIAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FGTAXSPIAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.67

2.47

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

0.81

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

0.84

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.46

+0.13

Drawdowns

FGTAX vs. SPIAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGTAX drawdown since its inception was -53.07%, roughly equal to the maximum SPIAX drawdown of -55.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGTAX and SPIAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FGTAXSPIAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.07%

-55.47%

+2.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.04%

-8.97%

-0.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.52%

-18.84%

+0.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.48%

-24.81%

+1.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.21%

-33.84%

-1.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.32%

0.00%

-0.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.78%

-10.78%

+4.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.99%

1.92%

+0.07%

Volatility

FGTAX vs. SPIAX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class A (FGTAX) and Invesco S&P 500 Index A (SPIAX) have volatilities of 2.71% and 2.82%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FGTAXSPIAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.71%

2.82%

-0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.04%

8.99%

+0.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.97%

11.90%

+0.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.68%

16.91%

-0.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.11%

18.09%

+0.02%

FGTAX vs. SPIAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGTAX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than SPIAX's 0.54% expense ratio.


Dividends

FGTAX vs. SPIAX - Dividend Comparison

FGTAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.37%, more than SPIAX's 0.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FGTAX
Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class A
3.37%3.72%2.48%1.86%4.17%4.61%7.84%12.91%21.65%16.21%1.75%3.75%
SPIAX
Invesco S&P 500 Index A
0.91%1.01%1.08%1.04%1.07%1.90%1.26%1.93%2.59%1.28%1.28%1.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, FGTAX and SPIAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SPIAX has higher volatility (2.82%) compared to FGTAX (2.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGTAX dropped -53.07% vs SPIAX's -55.47%.

FGTAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 2.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FGTAX and SPIAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer