FGSM vs. PID
FGSM (Frontier Asset Global Small Cap Equity ETF) and PID (Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF) are both Global Equities funds. FGSM is actively managed, while PID is passively managed. Over the past year, FGSM returned 44.14% vs 25.11% for PID. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FGSM charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for PID.
Performance
FGSM vs. PID - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FGSM achieves a 10.20% return, which is significantly higher than PID's 5.45% return.
FGSM
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 6.41%
- YTD
- 10.20%
- 6M
- 14.74%
- 1Y
- 44.14%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PID
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 4.07%
- YTD
- 5.45%
- 6M
- 9.26%
- 1Y
- 25.11%
- 3Y*
- 11.73%
- 5Y*
- 9.83%
- 10Y*
- 8.42%
FGSM vs. PID - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FGSM Frontier Asset Global Small Cap Equity ETF | 10.20% | 21.33% | 0.24% |
PID Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF | 5.45% | 24.45% | 0.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between FGSM and PID is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2024 | 0.74 |
The correlation between FGSM and PID has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.74 — a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FGSM vs. PID — Risk / Return Rank
FGSM
PID
FGSM vs. PID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Frontier Asset Global Small Cap Equity ETF (FGSM) and Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FGSM | PID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.01 | 2.66 | +0.35 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.13 | 3.92 | +0.21 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | 1.48 | +0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.42 | 3.62 | +0.80 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.36 | 13.92 | +3.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FGSM | PID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.01 | 2.66 | +0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.71 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.47 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.40 | 0.27 | +1.13 |
Drawdowns
FGSM vs. PID - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FGSM drawdown since its inception was -17.72%, smaller than the maximum PID drawdown of -66.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGSM and PID.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FGSM | PID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.72% | -66.34% | +48.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.84% | -7.47% | -2.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.97% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -46.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.91% | -2.20% | +1.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.35% | -13.10% | +10.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.51% | 1.94% | +0.57% |
Volatility
FGSM vs. PID - Volatility Comparison
Frontier Asset Global Small Cap Equity ETF (FGSM) has a higher volatility of 6.00% compared to Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PID) at 3.44%. This indicates that FGSM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FGSM | PID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.00% | 3.44% | +2.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.11% | 7.17% | +3.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.84% | 9.63% | +5.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.09% | 13.96% | +4.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.09% | 17.92% | +0.17% |
FGSM vs. PID - Expense Ratio Comparison
FGSM has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than PID's 0.56% expense ratio.
Dividends
FGSM vs. PID - Dividend Comparison
FGSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.41%, less than PID's 3.27% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGSM Frontier Asset Global Small Cap Equity ETF | 1.41% | 1.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PID Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF | 3.27% | 3.28% | 3.88% | 3.31% | 3.30% | 3.30% | 3.16% | 3.99% | 3.87% | 3.46% | 3.90% | 4.48% |