FGSM vs. NZAC
FGSM (Frontier Asset Global Small Cap Equity ETF) and NZAC (SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF) are both Global Equities funds. FGSM is actively managed, while NZAC is passively managed. Over the past year, FGSM returned 44.14% vs 34.02% for NZAC. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FGSM charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for NZAC.
Performance
FGSM vs. NZAC - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FGSM achieves a 10.20% return, which is significantly higher than NZAC's 4.37% return.
FGSM
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 6.41%
- YTD
- 10.20%
- 6M
- 14.74%
- 1Y
- 44.14%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NZAC
- 1D
- 1.47%
- 1M
- 8.80%
- YTD
- 4.37%
- 6M
- 6.58%
- 1Y
- 34.02%
- 3Y*
- 18.22%
- 5Y*
- 9.41%
- 10Y*
- 11.81%
FGSM vs. NZAC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FGSM Frontier Asset Global Small Cap Equity ETF | 10.20% | 21.33% | 0.24% |
NZAC SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF | 4.37% | 20.55% | -1.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between FGSM and NZAC is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2024 | 0.83 |
The correlation between FGSM and NZAC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.83 — a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FGSM vs. NZAC — Risk / Return Rank
FGSM
NZAC
FGSM vs. NZAC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Frontier Asset Global Small Cap Equity ETF (FGSM) and SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF (NZAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FGSM | NZAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.01 | 2.60 | +0.40 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.13 | 3.65 | +0.48 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | 1.47 | +0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.42 | 3.19 | +1.23 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.36 | 13.89 | +3.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FGSM | NZAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.01 | 2.60 | +0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.56 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.69 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.40 | 0.60 | +0.80 |
Drawdowns
FGSM vs. NZAC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FGSM drawdown since its inception was -17.72%, smaller than the maximum NZAC drawdown of -33.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGSM and NZAC.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FGSM | NZAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.72% | -33.72% | +16.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.84% | -10.10% | +0.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -28.31% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.91% | 0.00% | -0.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.35% | -5.38% | +3.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.51% | 2.32% | +0.19% |
Volatility
FGSM vs. NZAC - Volatility Comparison
Frontier Asset Global Small Cap Equity ETF (FGSM) and SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF (NZAC) have volatilities of 6.00% and 6.30%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FGSM | NZAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.00% | 6.30% | -0.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.11% | 10.34% | +0.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.84% | 13.19% | +1.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.09% | 16.80% | +1.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.09% | 17.12% | +0.97% |
FGSM vs. NZAC - Expense Ratio Comparison
FGSM has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than NZAC's 0.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
FGSM vs. NZAC - Dividend Comparison
FGSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.41%, less than NZAC's 1.82% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGSM Frontier Asset Global Small Cap Equity ETF | 1.41% | 1.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NZAC SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF | 1.82% | 1.90% | 1.88% | 1.65% | 1.81% | 1.62% | 1.59% | 2.17% | 2.53% | 2.20% | 2.00% | 2.40% |