PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FGSKX vs. VLEQX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FGSKX vs. VLEQX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth Fund Class R6 (FGSKX) and Villere Equity Fund (VLEQX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGSKX achieves a 1.77% return, which is significantly lower than VLEQX's 4.34% return. Over the past 10 years, FGSKX has outperformed VLEQX with an annualized return of 15.43%, while VLEQX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.60% annualized return.


FGSKX

1D
-0.82%
1M
2.77%
YTD
1.77%
6M
2.76%
1Y
5.71%
3Y*
20.12%
5Y*
11.31%
10Y*
15.43%

VLEQX

1D
-0.17%
1M
0.61%
YTD
4.34%
6M
4.15%
1Y
3.96%
3Y*
3.46%
5Y*
-2.34%
10Y*
3.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGSKX vs. VLEQX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FGSKX
Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth Fund Class R6
1.77%10.90%33.36%27.45%-24.38%22.74%35.92%28.35%-3.00%24.68%
VLEQX
Villere Equity Fund
4.34%0.26%1.50%11.37%-24.50%5.80%14.77%24.50%-6.98%7.34%

Correlation

The correlation between FGSKX and VLEQX is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2014

0.77

Over the past year, the correlation between FGSKX and VLEQX has dropped to 0.12 - well below their long-term average of 0.77, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FGSKX vs. VLEQX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGSKX
FGSKX Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
FGSKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGSKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGSKX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
FGSKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGSKX Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

VLEQX
VLEQX Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
VLEQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VLEQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
VLEQX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
VLEQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
VLEQX Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGSKX vs. VLEQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth Fund Class R6 (FGSKX) and Villere Equity Fund (VLEQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FGSKXVLEQXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.34

0.41

-0.07

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.61

0.66

-0.04

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.08

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.41

0.57

-0.17

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.12

1.56

-0.44

FGSKX vs. VLEQX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGSKX Sharpe Ratio is 0.34, which is comparable to the VLEQX Sharpe Ratio of 0.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGSKX and VLEQX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FGSKXVLEQXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

0.41

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

-0.12

+0.63

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

0.19

+0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.10

+0.34

Drawdowns

FGSKX vs. VLEQX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGSKX drawdown since its inception was -55.05%, which is greater than VLEQX's maximum drawdown of -35.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGSKX and VLEQX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FGSKXVLEQXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.05%

-35.60%

-19.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.01%

-8.09%

-5.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.47%

-19.24%

-5.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.68%

-33.46%

-2.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.16%

-35.60%

-1.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.32%

-15.72%

+12.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.86%

-12.45%

+1.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.08%

2.97%

+2.11%

Volatility

FGSKX vs. VLEQX - Volatility Comparison

Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth Fund Class R6 (FGSKX) has a higher volatility of 3.52% compared to Villere Equity Fund (VLEQX) at 2.17%. This indicates that FGSKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VLEQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FGSKXVLEQXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.52%

2.17%

+1.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.96%

7.80%

+6.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.02%

11.30%

+5.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.42%

19.15%

+3.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.38%

19.20%

+3.18%

FGSKX vs. VLEQX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGSKX has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is lower than VLEQX's 1.22% expense ratio.


Dividends

FGSKX vs. VLEQX - Dividend Comparison

FGSKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.27%, more than VLEQX's 0.51% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FGSKX
Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth Fund Class R6
5.27%5.37%4.70%0.00%2.52%28.15%7.60%8.72%15.47%14.82%0.89%26.74%
VLEQX
Villere Equity Fund
0.51%0.54%0.40%4.64%2.88%8.24%0.73%0.17%0.34%0.00%0.11%1.76%

Frequently Asked Questions


FGSKX and VLEQX have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FGSKX has higher volatility (3.52%) compared to VLEQX (2.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGSKX dropped -55.05% vs VLEQX's -35.60%.

VLEQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.41 vs 0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FGSKX and VLEQX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer