FGSKX vs. CTIGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth Fund Class R6 (FGSKX) and Calamos Timpani SMID Growth Fund (CTIGX).
FGSKX is an actively managed fund by Federated Hermes. It was launched on Dec 12, 2006. CTIGX is managed by Calamos. It was launched on Jul 31, 2019.
Performance
FGSKX vs. CTIGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FGSKX vs. CTIGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGSKX Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth Fund Class R6 | -9.48% | 10.90% | 33.36% | 27.45% | -24.38% | 22.74% | 35.92% | 0.27% |
CTIGX Calamos Timpani SMID Growth Fund | -5.11% | 21.21% | 44.09% | 12.26% | -34.88% | 7.64% | 58.94% | -3.80% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FGSKX achieves a -9.48% return, which is significantly lower than CTIGX's -5.11% return.
FGSKX
- 1D
- -0.81%
- 1M
- -9.32%
- YTD
- -9.48%
- 6M
- -11.69%
- 1Y
- 8.47%
- 3Y*
- 15.86%
- 5Y*
- 9.58%
- 10Y*
- 13.79%
CTIGX
- 1D
- -3.45%
- 1M
- -9.97%
- YTD
- -5.11%
- 6M
- -0.49%
- 1Y
- 31.37%
- 3Y*
- 20.88%
- 5Y*
- 4.28%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FGSKX vs. CTIGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FGSKX has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is lower than CTIGX's 1.10% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FGSKX vs. CTIGX — Risk / Return Rank
FGSKX
CTIGX
FGSKX vs. CTIGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth Fund Class R6 (FGSKX) and Calamos Timpani SMID Growth Fund (CTIGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FGSKX | CTIGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.28 | 1.17 | -0.88 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.56 | 1.68 | -1.12 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.22 | -0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.42 | 2.60 | -2.19 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.30 | 9.43 | -8.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FGSKX | CTIGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 | 1.17 | -0.88 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | 0.16 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | 0.38 | +0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between FGSKX and CTIGX is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FGSKX vs. CTIGX - Dividend Comparison
FGSKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.93%, more than CTIGX's 4.84% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGSKX Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth Fund Class R6 | 5.93% | 5.37% | 4.70% | 0.00% | 2.52% | 28.15% | 7.60% | 8.72% | 15.47% | 14.82% | 0.89% | 26.74% |
CTIGX Calamos Timpani SMID Growth Fund | 4.84% | 4.59% | 2.80% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 11.76% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FGSKX vs. CTIGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FGSKX drawdown since its inception was -55.05%, which is greater than CTIGX's maximum drawdown of -46.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGSKX and CTIGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FGSKX | CTIGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.05% | -46.26% | -8.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.01% | -11.56% | -2.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.68% | -46.26% | +10.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.16% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.01% | -11.56% | -2.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.90% | -19.06% | +8.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.50% | 3.19% | +1.31% |
Volatility
FGSKX vs. CTIGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth Fund Class R6 (FGSKX) is 5.42%, while Calamos Timpani SMID Growth Fund (CTIGX) has a volatility of 11.44%. This indicates that FGSKX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CTIGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FGSKX | CTIGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.42% | 11.44% | -6.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.12% | 20.05% | -5.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.55% | 28.24% | -7.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.41% | 26.74% | -4.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.35% | 29.03% | -6.68% |