PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FGSI vs. RSBY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FGSI vs. RSBY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Vest Growth Strength & Target Income ETF (FGSI) and Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF (RSBY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGSI achieves a 4.99% return, which is significantly lower than RSBY's 18.98% return.


FGSI

1D
-0.54%
1M
3.18%
YTD
4.99%
6M
5.04%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

RSBY

1D
0.63%
1M
-2.54%
YTD
18.98%
6M
14.31%
1Y
20.50%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGSI vs. RSBY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FGSI and RSBY is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2025

-0.17

FGSI vs. RSBY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FGSI
RSBY

Technology

30.5%
53.7%

Healthcare

17.6%
4.2%

Financial Services

16.2%
0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

13.6%
12.2%

Industrials

12.4%
3.1%

Communication Services

5.7%
15.8%

Energy

4.8%
0.6%

Consumer Defensive

2.0%
7.7%

Basic Materials

1.9%
1.1%

Real Estate

-

0.1%

Utilities

-

1.4%

Technology

FGSI
30.5%
RSBY
53.7%

Healthcare

FGSI
17.6%
RSBY
4.2%

Financial Services

FGSI
16.2%
RSBY
0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

FGSI
13.6%
RSBY
12.2%

Industrials

FGSI
12.4%
RSBY
3.1%

Communication Services

FGSI
5.7%
RSBY
15.8%

Energy

FGSI
4.8%
RSBY
0.6%

Consumer Defensive

FGSI
2.0%
RSBY
7.7%

Basic Materials

FGSI
1.9%
RSBY
1.1%

Real Estate

FGSI

-

RSBY
0.1%

Utilities

FGSI

-

RSBY
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FGSI vs. RSBY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGSI

RSBY
RSBY Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
RSBY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSBY Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSBY Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
RSBY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSBY Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGSI vs. RSBY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Vest Growth Strength & Target Income ETF (FGSI) and Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF (RSBY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FGSI vs. RSBY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FGSIRSBYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.75

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.85

-0.20

+1.04

Drawdowns

FGSI vs. RSBY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGSI drawdown since its inception was -8.25%, smaller than the maximum RSBY drawdown of -23.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGSI and RSBY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FGSIRSBYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.25%

-23.32%

+15.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.50%

-6.09%

+4.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.91%

-13.79%

+11.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.39%

Volatility

FGSI vs. RSBY - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FGSIRSBYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.43%

11.80%

+0.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.43%

13.56%

-1.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.43%

13.56%

-1.13%

FGSI vs. RSBY - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGSI has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than RSBY's 0.98% expense ratio.


Dividends

FGSI vs. RSBY - Dividend Comparison

FGSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.57%, more than RSBY's 1.74% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


FGSI and RSBY have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FGSI is cheaper at 0.85% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FGSI is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for RSBY.

FGSI has the higher dividend yield at 7.57%, compared with 1.74% for RSBY.

FGSI is categorized as Derivative Income, while RSBY is Multistrategy. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Return Stacked. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for FGSI and 0.98% for RSBY.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FGSI and RSBY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer