PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FGSI vs. IPDP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FGSI vs. IPDP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Vest Growth Strength & Target Income ETF (FGSI) and Dividend Performers ETF (IPDP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


FGSI

1D
-0.48%
1M
1.94%
6M
3.70%
YTD
6.66%
1Y
9.70%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IPDP

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGSI vs. IPDP - Yearly Performance Comparison


FGSI vs. IPDP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FGSI
IPDP

Technology

32.6%
13.1%

Healthcare

17.5%
13.6%

Financial Services

15.3%
18.6%

Consumer Cyclical

13.2%
3.6%

Industrials

11.2%
43.0%

Communication Services

6.1%

-

Energy

4.8%

-

Consumer Defensive

2.3%
3.9%

Basic Materials

1.9%
3.6%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

FGSI
32.6%
IPDP
13.1%

Healthcare

FGSI
17.5%
IPDP
13.6%

Financial Services

FGSI
15.3%
IPDP
18.6%

Consumer Cyclical

FGSI
13.2%
IPDP
3.6%

Industrials

FGSI
11.2%
IPDP
43.0%

Communication Services

FGSI
6.1%
IPDP

-

Energy

FGSI
4.8%
IPDP

-

Consumer Defensive

FGSI
2.3%
IPDP
3.9%

Basic Materials

FGSI
1.9%
IPDP
3.6%

Real Estate

FGSI

-

IPDP

-

Utilities

FGSI

-

IPDP

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FGSI vs. IPDP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGSI
FGSI Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
FGSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGSI Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
FGSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGSI Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

IPDP

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGSI vs. IPDP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Vest Growth Strength & Target Income ETF (FGSI) and Dividend Performers ETF (IPDP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FGSIIPDPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.79

FGSI vs. IPDP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FGSI vs. IPDP - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FGSIIPDPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.56%

Volatility

FGSI vs. IPDP - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FGSIIPDPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.47%

FGSI vs. IPDP - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGSI has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than IPDP's 1.52% expense ratio.


Dividends

FGSI vs. IPDP - Dividend Comparison

FGSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.19%, while IPDP has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, FGSI is cheaper at 0.85% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FGSI is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 1.52% for IPDP.

FGSI has the higher dividend yield at 8.19%, compared with 0.00% for IPDP.

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Innovative Portfolios. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for FGSI and 1.52% for IPDP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FGSI and IPDP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer