FGSI vs. BPH
FGSI (First Trust Vest Growth Strength & Target Income ETF) and BPH (BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FGSI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by First Trust, while BPH is a Oil & Gas fund actively managed by Precidian. Both are actively managed. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FGSI charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for BPH.
Performance
FGSI vs. BPH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FGSI
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- 3.18%
- YTD
- 4.99%
- 6M
- 5.04%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BPH
- 1D
- 1.20%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FGSI vs. BPH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
FGSI First Trust Vest Growth Strength & Target Income ETF | 0.59% |
BPH BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF | 2.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between FGSI and BPH is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2026 | 0.20 |
FGSI vs. BPH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FGSI
BPH
Technology
-
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
-
Communication Services
-
Energy
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
FGSI
BPH
-
Healthcare
FGSI
BPH
-
Financial Services
FGSI
BPH
-
Consumer Cyclical
FGSI
BPH
-
Industrials
FGSI
BPH
-
Communication Services
FGSI
BPH
-
Energy
FGSI
BPH
Consumer Defensive
FGSI
BPH
-
Basic Materials
FGSI
BPH
-
Real Estate
FGSI
-
BPH
-
Utilities
FGSI
-
BPH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FGSI vs. BPH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Vest Growth Strength & Target Income ETF (FGSI) and BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF (BPH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FGSI | BPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.85 | 9.48 | -8.63 |
Drawdowns
FGSI vs. BPH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FGSI drawdown since its inception was -8.25%, which is greater than BPH's maximum drawdown of -2.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGSI and BPH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FGSI | BPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.25% | -2.35% | -5.90% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.50% | 0.00% | -1.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.91% | -1.08% | -0.83% |
Volatility
FGSI vs. BPH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FGSI | BPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.43% | 25.75% | -13.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.43% | 25.75% | -13.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.43% | 25.75% | -13.32% |
FGSI vs. BPH - Expense Ratio Comparison
FGSI has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than BPH's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
FGSI vs. BPH - Dividend Comparison
FGSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.57%, while BPH has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BPH BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FGSI First Trust Vest Growth Strength & Target Income ETF | 7.57% | 4.20% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FGSI and BPH have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BPH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BPH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for FGSI.
FGSI has the higher dividend yield at 7.57%, compared with 0.00% for BPH.
FGSI is categorized as Derivative Income, while BPH is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Precidian. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for FGSI and 0.19% for BPH.
Find the right allocation for FGSI and BPH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer