FGSAX vs. BEARX
FGSAX (Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth Fund) and BEARX (Federated Hermes Prudent Bear Fd) are both mutual funds - FGSAX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Federated, while BEARX is a Inverse Equities fund managed by Federated. Over the past 10 years, FGSAX returned 15.12%/yr vs -14.66%/yr for BEARX. At a correlation of -0.82, they often move in opposite directions. FGSAX charges 1.15%/yr vs 1.78%/yr for BEARX.
Performance
FGSAX vs. BEARX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FGSAX achieves a 1.66% return, which is significantly higher than BEARX's -9.50% return. Over the past 10 years, FGSAX has outperformed BEARX with an annualized return of 15.12%, while BEARX has yielded a comparatively lower -14.66% annualized return.
FGSAX
- 1D
- -0.82%
- 1M
- 2.76%
- YTD
- 1.66%
- 6M
- 2.62%
- 1Y
- 5.40%
- 3Y*
- 19.76%
- 5Y*
- 10.98%
- 10Y*
- 15.12%
BEARX
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- -5.77%
- YTD
- -9.50%
- 6M
- -9.81%
- 1Y
- -19.70%
- 3Y*
- -16.79%
- 5Y*
- -12.48%
- 10Y*
- -14.66%
FGSAX vs. BEARX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGSAX Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth Fund | 1.66% | 10.54% | 32.97% | 27.05% | -24.60% | 22.39% | 35.50% | 27.95% | -3.23% | 24.38% |
BEARX Federated Hermes Prudent Bear Fd | -9.50% | -12.42% | -20.34% | -18.67% | 17.78% | -23.78% | -22.95% | -19.95% | -5.96% | -15.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between FGSAX and BEARX is -0.67, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.84 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 29, 1995 | -0.82 |
The correlation between FGSAX and BEARX shifts across timeframes, from -0.84 (5 years) to -0.67 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FGSAX vs. BEARX — Risk / Return Rank
FGSAX
BEARX
FGSAX vs. BEARX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth Fund (FGSAX) and Federated Hermes Prudent Bear Fd (BEARX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FGSAX | BEARX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 0.70 | +0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.40 | -1.00 | +1.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.11 | -1.89 | +2.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FGSAX | BEARX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 | -1.75 | +2.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 | -0.74 | +1.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 | -0.88 | +1.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | -0.02 | +0.50 |
Drawdowns
FGSAX vs. BEARX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FGSAX drawdown since its inception was -66.17%, smaller than the maximum BEARX drawdown of -95.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGSAX and BEARX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FGSAX | BEARX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.17% | -95.75% | +29.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.73% | -19.52% | +5.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.51% | -44.46% | +19.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.79% | -52.48% | +16.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.19% | -80.48% | +43.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.06% | -95.75% | +92.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.15% | -61.04% | +44.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.90% | 10.45% | -5.55% |
Volatility
FGSAX vs. BEARX - Volatility Comparison
Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth Fund (FGSAX) has a higher volatility of 3.54% compared to Federated Hermes Prudent Bear Fd (BEARX) at 2.86%. This indicates that FGSAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BEARX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FGSAX | BEARX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.54% | 2.86% | +0.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.72% | 8.76% | +4.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.85% | 11.32% | +5.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.41% | 16.97% | +5.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.32% | 16.67% | +5.65% |
FGSAX vs. BEARX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FGSAX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is lower than BEARX's 1.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
FGSAX vs. BEARX - Dividend Comparison
FGSAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.84%, less than BEARX's 7.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BEARX Federated Hermes Prudent Bear Fd | 7.42% | 6.71% | 0.00% | 13.32% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.62% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FGSAX Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth Fund | 4.84% | 4.92% | 4.32% | 0.00% | 2.31% | 25.75% | 7.07% | 8.13% | 14.46% | 13.93% | 0.89% | 25.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FGSAX and BEARX have a correlation of -0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FGSAX has higher volatility (3.54%) compared to BEARX (2.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGSAX dropped -66.17% vs BEARX's -95.75%.
FGSAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.32 vs -1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FGSAX and BEARX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer