PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FGSAX vs. BBMIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FGSAX vs. BBMIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth Fund (FGSAX) and BBH Select Series - Mid Cap Fund (BBMIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGSAX achieves a 1.66% return, which is significantly lower than BBMIX's 2.86% return.


FGSAX

1D
-0.82%
1M
2.76%
YTD
1.66%
6M
2.62%
1Y
5.40%
3Y*
19.76%
5Y*
10.98%
10Y*
15.12%

BBMIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
2.86%
6M
2.86%
1Y
1.23%
3Y*
6.69%
5Y*
3.05%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGSAX vs. BBMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FGSAX
Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth Fund
1.66%10.54%32.97%27.05%-24.60%17.17%
BBMIX
BBH Select Series - Mid Cap Fund
2.86%-6.45%11.41%26.01%-24.76%13.50%

Correlation

The correlation between FGSAX and BBMIX is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 25, 2021

0.73

Over the past year, the correlation between FGSAX and BBMIX has dropped to 0.02 - well below their long-term average of 0.73, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FGSAX vs. BBMIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGSAX
FGSAX Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
FGSAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGSAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGSAX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
FGSAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGSAX Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

BBMIX
BBMIX Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
BBMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
BBMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGSAX vs. BBMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth Fund (FGSAX) and BBH Select Series - Mid Cap Fund (BBMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FGSAXBBMIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.07

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.40

0.32

+0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.11

0.50

+0.61

FGSAX vs. BBMIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGSAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.32, which is higher than the BBMIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGSAX and BBMIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FGSAXBBMIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

0.24

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

0.16

+0.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.15

+0.33

Drawdowns

FGSAX vs. BBMIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGSAX drawdown since its inception was -66.17%, which is greater than BBMIX's maximum drawdown of -28.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGSAX and BBMIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FGSAXBBMIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.17%

-28.90%

-37.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.73%

-8.89%

-4.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.51%

-23.79%

-0.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.79%

-28.90%

-6.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.06%

-11.28%

+8.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.15%

-10.51%

-5.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.90%

5.68%

-0.78%

Volatility

FGSAX vs. BBMIX - Volatility Comparison

Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth Fund (FGSAX) has a higher volatility of 3.54% compared to BBH Select Series - Mid Cap Fund (BBMIX) at 0.00%. This indicates that FGSAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FGSAXBBMIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.54%

0.00%

+3.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.72%

6.37%

+7.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.85%

11.62%

+5.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.41%

19.72%

+2.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.32%

19.68%

+2.64%

FGSAX vs. BBMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGSAX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than BBMIX's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

FGSAX vs. BBMIX - Dividend Comparison

FGSAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.84%, while BBMIX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBMIX
BBH Select Series - Mid Cap Fund
0.00%0.00%0.32%0.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FGSAX
Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth Fund
4.84%4.92%4.32%0.00%2.31%25.75%7.07%8.13%14.46%13.93%0.89%25.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


FGSAX and BBMIX have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FGSAX has higher volatility (3.54%) compared to BBMIX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGSAX dropped -66.17% vs BBMIX's -28.90%.

FGSAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.32 vs 0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FGSAX and BBMIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer