FGRCX vs. MUHLX

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

FGRCX (Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class C) and MUHLX (Muhlenkamp Fund) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, FGRCX returned 15.33%/yr vs 10.39%/yr for MUHLX. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FGRCX charges 1.67%/yr vs 1.14%/yr for MUHLX.

Performance

FGRCX vs. MUHLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class C (FGRCX) and Muhlenkamp Fund (MUHLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGRCX achieves a 11.09% return, which is significantly higher than MUHLX's 8.33% return. Over the past 10 years, FGRCX has outperformed MUHLX with an annualized return of 15.33%, while MUHLX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.39% annualized return.

FGRCX

• 1D: 0.61%
• 1M: 2.73%
• 6M: 8.19%
• YTD: 11.09%
• 1Y: 23.34%
• 3Y*: 23.73%
• 5Y*: 15.36%
• 10Y*: 15.33%

MUHLX

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: -1.58%
• 6M: 2.79%
• YTD: 8.33%
• 1Y: 17.16%
• 3Y*: 11.19%
• 5Y*: 10.79%
• 10Y*: 10.39%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGRCX vs. MUHLX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FGRCX Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class C	11.09%	25.57%	24.67%	25.21%	-9.98%	24.96%	11.74%	29.78%	-8.37%	16.67%
MUHLX Muhlenkamp Fund	8.33%	17.82%	3.38%	13.92%	2.89%	28.98%	11.96%	14.39%	-13.29%	18.78%

Correlation

The correlation between FGRCX and MUHLX is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.59
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.71
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.78
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2008	0.87

Over the past year, the correlation between FGRCX and MUHLX has dropped to 0.59 - well below their long-term average of 0.87, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

FGRCX vs. MUHLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGRCX

FGRCX Risk / Return Rank: 70
FGRCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
FGRCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
FGRCX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
FGRCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
FGRCX Martin Ratio Rank: 78

MUHLX

MUHLX Risk / Return Rank: 29
MUHLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
MUHLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
MUHLX Omega Ratio Rank: 27
MUHLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
MUHLX Martin Ratio Rank: 30

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGRCX vs. MUHLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class C (FGRCX) and Muhlenkamp Fund (MUHLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FGRCX	MUHLX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.86	1.17	+0.69
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.59	1.65	+0.94
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.21	+0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.55	1.66	+0.89
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.09	5.28	+5.82

FGRCX vs. MUHLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGRCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is higher than the MUHLX Sharpe Ratio of 1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGRCX and MUHLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FGRCX vs. MUHLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGRCX drawdown since its inception was -53.01%, smaller than the maximum MUHLX drawdown of -62.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGRCX and MUHLX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FGRCX	MUHLX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.01%	-62.05%	+9.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.13%	-10.23%	+1.10%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.62%	-18.63%	+0.01%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.86%	-18.63%	-5.23%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.35%	-40.85%	+5.50%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-6.32%	+6.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.97%	-10.76%	+3.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.10%	3.22%	-1.12%

Volatility

FGRCX vs. MUHLX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class C (FGRCX) and Muhlenkamp Fund (MUHLX) have volatilities of 4.00% and 3.82%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FGRCX	MUHLX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.00%	3.82%	+0.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.66%	10.99%	-1.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.54%	14.52%	-1.98%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.76%	14.59%	+2.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.08%	17.03%	+1.05%

FGRCX vs. MUHLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGRCX has a 1.67% expense ratio, which is higher than MUHLX's 1.14% expense ratio.

Dividends

FGRCX vs. MUHLX - Dividend Comparison

FGRCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.87%, less than MUHLX's 3.08% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FGRCX Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class C	2.87%	3.19%	1.88%	1.23%	3.43%	3.88%	7.29%	12.35%	21.04%	15.67%	1.05%	3.23%
MUHLX Muhlenkamp Fund	3.08%	3.34%	0.58%	0.89%	6.80%	7.77%	10.28%	1.26%	14.70%	4.30%	0.00%	11.02%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FGRCX and MUHLX in my portfolio?

FGRCX and MUHLX have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FGRCX or MUHLX?

FGRCX has higher volatility (4.00%) compared to MUHLX (3.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGRCX dropped -53.01% vs MUHLX's -62.05%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FGRCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.