FGRCX vs. FZALX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FGRCX (Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class C) and FZALX (Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class Z) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds from Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, FGRCX returned 15.36%/yr vs 16.71%/yr for FZALX. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FGRCX charges 1.67%/yr vs 0.51%/yr for FZALX.

Performance

FGRCX vs. FZALX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class C (FGRCX) and Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class Z (FZALX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGRCX achieves a 9.99% return, which is significantly lower than FZALX's 10.54% return. Over the past 10 years, FGRCX has underperformed FZALX with an annualized return of 15.36%, while FZALX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.71% annualized return.

FGRCX

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: 3.31%
• YTD: 9.99%
• 6M: 11.82%
• 1Y: 30.01%
• 3Y*: 24.26%
• 5Y*: 15.10%
• 10Y*: 15.36%

FZALX

• 1D: -0.32%
• 1M: 3.44%
• YTD: 10.54%
• 6M: 12.47%
• 1Y: 31.53%
• 3Y*: 25.73%
• 5Y*: 16.44%
• 10Y*: 16.71%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGRCX vs. FZALX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FGRCX Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class C	9.99%	25.57%	24.67%	25.21%	-9.98%	24.96%	11.74%	29.78%	-8.37%	16.67%
FZALX Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class Z	10.54%	27.07%	26.13%	26.63%	-8.89%	26.44%	13.06%	31.25%	-7.31%	18.01%

Correlation

The correlation between FGRCX and FZALX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.00
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	1.00
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.00
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.00
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2013	1.00

The correlation between FGRCX and FZALX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FGRCX vs. FZALX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGRCX

FGRCX Risk / Return Rank: 75
FGRCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
FGRCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
FGRCX Omega Ratio Rank: 70
FGRCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
FGRCX Martin Ratio Rank: 81

FZALX

FZALX Risk / Return Rank: 81
FZALX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
FZALX Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
FZALX Omega Ratio Rank: 75
FZALX Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
FZALX Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGRCX vs. FZALX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class C (FGRCX) and Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class Z (FZALX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FGRCX	FZALX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.58	2.71	-0.13
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.55	3.72	-0.17
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	1.49	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.38	3.61	-0.23
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.23	16.39	-1.15
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FGRCX vs. FZALX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGRCX Sharpe Ratio is 2.58, which is comparable to the FZALX Sharpe Ratio of 2.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGRCX and FZALX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FGRCX	FZALX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.58	2.71	-0.13
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.91	0.99	-0.08
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.85	0.92	-0.07
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.55	0.86	-0.31

Drawdowns

FGRCX vs. FZALX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGRCX drawdown since its inception was -53.01%, which is greater than FZALX's maximum drawdown of -35.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGRCX and FZALX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FGRCX	FZALX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.01%	-35.23%	-17.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.13%	-8.99%	-0.14%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.62%	-18.49%	-0.13%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.86%	-23.25%	-0.61%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.35%	-35.23%	-0.12%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.33%	-0.32%	-0.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.00%	-3.78%	-3.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.02%	1.98%	+0.04%

Volatility

FGRCX vs. FZALX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class C (FGRCX) and Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class Z (FZALX) have volatilities of 2.72% and 2.73%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FGRCX	FZALX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.72%	2.73%	-0.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.06%	9.06%	0.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.99%	11.98%	+0.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.72%	16.70%	+0.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.15%	18.14%	+0.01%

FGRCX vs. FZALX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGRCX has a 1.67% expense ratio, which is higher than FZALX's 0.51% expense ratio.

Dividends

FGRCX vs. FZALX - Dividend Comparison

FGRCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.90%, less than FZALX's 3.65% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FGRCX Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class C	2.90%	3.19%	1.88%	1.23%	3.43%	3.88%	7.29%	12.35%	21.04%	15.67%	1.05%	3.23%
FZALX Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class Z	3.65%	4.04%	2.83%	2.17%	4.51%	4.92%	8.14%	13.19%	21.94%	16.56%	2.12%	4.33%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FGRCX and FZALX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 1.00, FGRCX and FZALX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FGRCX or FZALX?

FZALX has higher volatility (2.73%) compared to FGRCX (2.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGRCX dropped -53.01% vs FZALX's -35.23%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FZALX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 2.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.