PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FGRAX vs. FVCAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FGRAX vs. FVCAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Growth Opportunities Fund Class A (FGRAX) and Franklin California High Yield Municipal Fund Advisor Class (FVCAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGRAX achieves a 4.01% return, which is significantly higher than FVCAX's 1.06% return. Over the past 10 years, FGRAX has outperformed FVCAX with an annualized return of 17.14%, while FVCAX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.29% annualized return.


FGRAX

1D
2.86%
1M
-3.61%
6M
4.99%
YTD
4.01%
1Y
7.23%
3Y*
14.93%
5Y*
9.86%
10Y*
17.14%
ALL TIME*
11.34%

FVCAX

1D
-0.31%
1M
-2.04%
6M
0.48%
YTD
1.06%
1Y
6.49%
3Y*
4.56%
5Y*
0.45%
10Y*
2.29%
ALL TIME*
3.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FGRAX vs. FVCAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FGRAX
Franklin Growth Opportunities Fund Class A
4.01%8.10%25.65%39.54%-37.14%48.19%45.48%46.91%-1.32%28.78%
FVCAX
Franklin California High Yield Municipal Fund Advisor Class
1.06%4.77%4.98%4.66%-11.86%3.97%4.64%10.29%1.15%6.87%

Correlation

The correlation between FGRAX and FVCAX is 0.22, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 15, 2006

-0.07

The correlation between FGRAX and FVCAX shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (all time) to 0.22 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FGRAX vs. FVCAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FGRAX
FGRAX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
FGRAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGRAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGRAX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
FGRAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGRAX Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

FVCAX
FVCAX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
FVCAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FVCAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
FVCAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
FVCAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
FVCAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FGRAX vs. FVCAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Growth Opportunities Fund Class A (FGRAX) and Franklin California High Yield Municipal Fund Advisor Class (FVCAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FGRAXFVCAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.56

-0.49

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.35

2.68

-2.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.10

9.54

-8.44

FGRAX vs. FVCAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGRAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.30, which is lower than the FVCAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGRAX and FVCAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FGRAX vs. FVCAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGRAX drawdown since its inception was -78.79%, which is greater than FVCAX's maximum drawdown of -24.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGRAX and FVCAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FGRAXFVCAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.79%

-24.06%

-54.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.82%

-2.84%

-12.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.30%

-6.15%

-20.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.30%

-17.59%

-22.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.30%

-17.59%

-22.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.61%

-2.04%

-4.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.65%

-3.54%

-25.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.98%

0.80%

+4.18%

Volatility

FGRAX vs. FVCAX - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Growth Opportunities Fund Class A (FGRAX) has a higher volatility of 6.11% compared to Franklin California High Yield Municipal Fund Advisor Class (FVCAX) at 0.99%. This indicates that FGRAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FVCAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FGRAXFVCAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.11%

0.99%

+5.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.06%

2.55%

+12.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.22%

3.24%

+14.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.85%

4.73%

+22.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.43%

4.84%

+19.59%

FGRAX vs. FVCAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGRAX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than FVCAX's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

FGRAX vs. FVCAX - Dividend Comparison

FGRAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.97%, more than FVCAX's 4.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FGRAX
Franklin Growth Opportunities Fund Class A
18.97%19.73%10.72%13.47%4.83%28.81%5.83%17.52%13.10%8.71%2.09%2.04%
FVCAX
Franklin California High Yield Municipal Fund Advisor Class
4.11%5.82%4.87%3.46%3.65%3.10%3.30%4.05%3.85%3.45%3.86%4.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


FGRAX and FVCAX have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FGRAX has higher volatility (6.11%) compared to FVCAX (0.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGRAX dropped -78.79% vs FVCAX's -24.06%.

FVCAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FGRAX and FVCAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer