FGRAX vs. FFACX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FGRAX (Franklin Growth Opportunities Fund Class A) and FFACX (Franklin Global Allocation Fund Class C) are both mutual funds - FGRAX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Franklin, while FFACX is a Global Allocation fund actively managed by Franklin. Both are actively managed. Over the past 10 years, FGRAX returned 18.70%/yr vs 7.09%/yr for FFACX. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FGRAX charges 0.89%/yr vs 1.74%/yr for FFACX.

Performance

FGRAX vs. FFACX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Growth Opportunities Fund Class A (FGRAX) and Franklin Global Allocation Fund Class C (FFACX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGRAX achieves a 9.76% return, which is significantly higher than FFACX's 7.60% return. Over the past 10 years, FGRAX has outperformed FFACX with an annualized return of 18.70%, while FFACX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.09% annualized return.

FGRAX

• 1D: -1.09%
• 1M: 2.47%
• YTD: 9.76%
• 6M: 8.23%
• 1Y: 16.49%
• 3Y*: 19.20%
• 5Y*: 11.65%
• 10Y*: 18.70%

FFACX

• 1D: -0.17%
• 1M: 1.06%
• YTD: 7.60%
• 6M: 7.16%
• 1Y: 18.21%
• 3Y*: 13.81%
• 5Y*: 7.37%
• 10Y*: 7.09%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGRAX vs. FFACX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FGRAX Franklin Growth Opportunities Fund Class A	9.76%	8.10%	25.65%	39.54%	-37.14%	48.19%	45.48%	46.91%	-1.32%	28.78%
FFACX Franklin Global Allocation Fund Class C	7.60%	15.09%	12.06%	11.99%	-12.43%	10.89%	0.71%	16.90%	-10.54%	10.44%

Correlation

The correlation between FGRAX and FFACX is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.86
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.86
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.74
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2003	0.77

The correlation between FGRAX and FFACX shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (10 years) to 0.87 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FGRAX vs. FFACX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGRAX

FGRAX Risk / Return Rank: 15
FGRAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
FGRAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
FGRAX Omega Ratio Rank: 16
FGRAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
FGRAX Martin Ratio Rank: 15

FFACX

FFACX Risk / Return Rank: 61
FFACX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
FFACX Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
FFACX Omega Ratio Rank: 60
FFACX Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
FFACX Martin Ratio Rank: 68

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGRAX vs. FFACX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Growth Opportunities Fund Class A (FGRAX) and Franklin Global Allocation Fund Class C (FFACX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FGRAX	FFACX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.05	2.09	-1.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.51	2.96	-1.45
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.39	-0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.14	2.81	-1.67
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.76	12.35	-8.59

FGRAX vs. FFACX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGRAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is lower than the FFACX Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGRAX and FFACX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FGRAX vs. FFACX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGRAX drawdown since its inception was -78.79%, which is greater than FFACX's maximum drawdown of -53.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGRAX and FFACX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FGRAX	FFACX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-78.79%	-53.66%	-25.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.82%	-6.75%	-9.07%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.30%	-10.99%	-15.31%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-40.30%	-18.76%	-21.54%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.30%	-30.23%	-10.07%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.45%	-0.33%	-1.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-28.75%	-7.95%	-20.80%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.79%	1.53%	+3.26%

Volatility

FGRAX vs. FFACX - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Growth Opportunities Fund Class A (FGRAX) has a higher volatility of 7.14% compared to Franklin Global Allocation Fund Class C (FFACX) at 3.49%. This indicates that FGRAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFACX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FGRAX	FFACX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.14%	3.49%	+3.65%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.81%	7.65%	+6.16%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.12%	9.11%	+8.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.70%	10.09%	+16.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.41%	11.47%	+12.94%

FGRAX vs. FFACX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGRAX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is lower than FFACX's 1.74% expense ratio.

Dividends

FGRAX vs. FFACX - Dividend Comparison

FGRAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.97%, more than FFACX's 4.42% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FFACX Franklin Global Allocation Fund Class C	4.42%	4.52%	0.39%	0.90%	3.57%	0.45%	6.72%	2.24%	2.38%	2.21%	1.48%	2.17%
FGRAX Franklin Growth Opportunities Fund Class A	17.97%	19.73%	10.72%	13.47%	4.83%	28.81%	5.83%	17.52%	13.10%	8.71%	2.09%	2.04%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FGRAX and FFACX in my portfolio?

FGRAX and FFACX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FGRAX or FFACX?

FGRAX has higher volatility (7.14%) compared to FFACX (3.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGRAX dropped -78.79% vs FFACX's -53.66%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FFACX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.