PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FGRAX vs. FRDAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FGRAX vs. FRDAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Growth Opportunities Fund Class A (FGRAX) and Franklin Rising Dividends Fund Advisor Class (FRDAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGRAX achieves a 6.93% return, which is significantly lower than FRDAX's 8.87% return. Over the past 10 years, FGRAX has outperformed FRDAX with an annualized return of 17.38%, while FRDAX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.70% annualized return.


FGRAX

1D
1.82%
1M
-0.91%
6M
8.89%
YTD
6.93%
1Y
8.20%
3Y*
17.15%
5Y*
10.27%
10Y*
17.38%
ALL TIME*
11.45%

FRDAX

1D
0.66%
1M
2.17%
6M
7.61%
YTD
8.87%
1Y
12.83%
3Y*
12.39%
5Y*
8.17%
10Y*
11.70%
ALL TIME*
9.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FGRAX vs. FRDAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FGRAX
Franklin Growth Opportunities Fund Class A
6.93%8.10%25.65%39.54%-37.14%48.19%45.48%46.91%-1.32%28.78%
FRDAX
Franklin Rising Dividends Fund Advisor Class
8.87%12.24%11.20%12.37%-10.45%26.93%16.58%30.16%-5.04%20.09%

Correlation

The correlation between FGRAX and FRDAX is 0.64, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2005

0.81

The correlation between FGRAX and FRDAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.81 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FGRAX vs. FRDAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FGRAX
FGRAX Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
FGRAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGRAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGRAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
FGRAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGRAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

FRDAX
FRDAX Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
FRDAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRDAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRDAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
FRDAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRDAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FGRAX vs. FRDAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Growth Opportunities Fund Class A (FGRAX) and Franklin Rising Dividends Fund Advisor Class (FRDAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FGRAXFRDAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.25

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.65

2.04

-1.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.05

7.92

-5.87

FGRAX vs. FRDAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGRAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.56, which is lower than the FRDAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGRAX and FRDAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FGRAX vs. FRDAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGRAX drawdown since its inception was -78.79%, which is greater than FRDAX's maximum drawdown of -51.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGRAX and FRDAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FGRAXFRDAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.79%

-51.38%

-27.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.82%

-7.09%

-8.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.30%

-18.28%

-8.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.30%

-20.93%

-19.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.30%

-34.87%

-5.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.99%

0.00%

-3.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.64%

-6.40%

-22.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.00%

1.82%

+3.18%

Volatility

FGRAX vs. FRDAX - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Growth Opportunities Fund Class A (FGRAX) has a higher volatility of 6.32% compared to Franklin Rising Dividends Fund Advisor Class (FRDAX) at 2.65%. This indicates that FGRAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRDAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FGRAXFRDAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.32%

2.65%

+3.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.12%

7.77%

+7.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.26%

10.31%

+7.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.87%

15.35%

+11.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.44%

17.11%

+7.33%

FGRAX vs. FRDAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGRAX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than FRDAX's 0.43% expense ratio.


Dividends

FGRAX vs. FRDAX - Dividend Comparison

FGRAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.45%, more than FRDAX's 9.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FGRAX
Franklin Growth Opportunities Fund Class A
18.45%19.73%10.72%13.47%4.83%28.81%5.83%17.52%13.10%8.71%2.09%2.04%
FRDAX
Franklin Rising Dividends Fund Advisor Class
9.66%10.53%10.44%4.85%5.23%4.65%1.04%3.25%5.49%3.23%3.27%5.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


FGRAX and FRDAX have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FGRAX has higher volatility (6.32%) compared to FRDAX (2.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGRAX dropped -78.79% vs FRDAX's -51.38%.

FRDAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs 0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FGRAX and FRDAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer