ACS.MC vs. EN.PA
Compare and contrast key facts about ACS Actividades de Construccion y Servicios SA (ACS.MC) and Bouygues SA (EN.PA).
Performance
ACS.MC vs. EN.PA - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ACS.MC vs. EN.PA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACS.MC ACS Actividades de Construccion y Servicios SA | 32.88% | 81.61% | 26.94% | 60.10% | 23.98% | -6.88% | -17.39% | 10.97% | 7.91% | 12.69% |
EN.PA Bouygues SA | 15.04% | 63.79% | -11.77% | 28.77% | -5.69% | -1.78% | -6.45% | 27.02% | -24.60% | 32.65% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACS.MC achieves a 32.88% return, which is significantly higher than EN.PA's 15.04% return. Over the past 10 years, ACS.MC has outperformed EN.PA with an annualized return of 22.08%, while EN.PA has yielded a comparatively lower 9.19% annualized return.
ACS.MC
- 1D
- 7.06%
- 1M
- 2.37%
- YTD
- 32.88%
- 6M
- 66.30%
- 1Y
- 117.07%
- 3Y*
- 63.82%
- 5Y*
- 39.90%
- 10Y*
- 22.08%
EN.PA
- 1D
- 3.26%
- 1M
- -1.96%
- YTD
- 15.04%
- 6M
- 33.00%
- 1Y
- 45.49%
- 3Y*
- 24.52%
- 5Y*
- 14.32%
- 10Y*
- 9.19%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACS.MC vs. EN.PA — Risk / Return Rank
ACS.MC
EN.PA
ACS.MC vs. EN.PA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ACS Actividades de Construccion y Servicios SA (ACS.MC) and Bouygues SA (EN.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ACS.MC | EN.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 4.01 | 2.09 | +1.92 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.39 | 2.72 | +1.67 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.60 | 1.39 | +0.21 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 13.49 | 5.09 | +8.40 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 43.81 | 13.69 | +30.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ACS.MC | EN.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.01 | 2.09 | +1.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.71 | 0.72 | +0.99 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 | 0.35 | +0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.30 | +0.23 |
Correlation
The correlation between ACS.MC and EN.PA is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
ACS.MC vs. EN.PA - Dividend Comparison
ACS.MC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, less than EN.PA's 3.92% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACS.MC ACS Actividades de Construccion y Servicios SA | 1.80% | 2.37% | 4.16% | 4.89% | 7.48% | 7.31% | 7.33% | 5.33% | 4.09% | 3.67% | 3.83% | 4.27% |
EN.PA Bouygues SA | 3.92% | 4.51% | 6.66% | 5.28% | 6.42% | 5.40% | 5.05% | 4.49% | 5.42% | 3.69% | 4.70% | 4.38% |
Drawdowns
ACS.MC vs. EN.PA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACS.MC drawdown since its inception was -75.71%, smaller than the maximum EN.PA drawdown of -81.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACS.MC and EN.PA.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACS.MC | EN.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.71% | -81.68% | +5.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.52% | -10.05% | -3.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.69% | -24.21% | +1.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -70.52% | -44.57% | -25.95% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -3.22% | +3.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.08% | -32.44% | +13.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.05% | 3.74% | -0.69% |
Volatility
ACS.MC vs. EN.PA - Volatility Comparison
ACS Actividades de Construccion y Servicios SA (ACS.MC) has a higher volatility of 11.63% compared to Bouygues SA (EN.PA) at 6.64%. This indicates that ACS.MC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EN.PA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ACS.MC | EN.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.63% | 6.64% | +4.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.47% | 15.29% | +7.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.74% | 21.51% | +7.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.97% | 19.53% | +3.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.23% | 25.61% | +4.62% |
Financials
ACS.MC vs. EN.PA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ACS Actividades de Construccion y Servicios SA and Bouygues SA. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities