FGQD.L vs. WRDA.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

FGQD.L (Fidelity Global Quality Income ETF) and WRDA.L (UBS Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both Global Equities funds - FGQD.L tracks the Fidelity Global Quality Income index while WRDA.L tracks the MSCI World Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, FGQD.L returned 26.89% vs 27.42% for WRDA.L. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FGQD.L charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for WRDA.L.

Performance

FGQD.L vs. WRDA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Fidelity Global Quality Income ETF (FGQD.L) and UBS Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD Acc (WRDA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FGQD.L having a 10.28% return and WRDA.L slightly lower at 10.16%.

FGQD.L

• 1D: 0.18%
• 1M: 4.38%
• YTD: 10.28%
• 6M: 10.17%
• 1Y: 26.89%
• 3Y*: 14.75%
• 5Y*: 11.86%
• 10Y*: —

WRDA.L

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: 5.13%
• YTD: 10.16%
• 6M: 10.42%
• 1Y: 27.42%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGQD.L vs. WRDA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FGQD.L Fidelity Global Quality Income ETF	10.28%	11.78%	12.12%
WRDA.L UBS Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD Acc	10.16%	12.77%	20.02%

Correlation

The correlation between FGQD.L and WRDA.L is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.70
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2024	0.84

The correlation between FGQD.L and WRDA.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.84 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FGQD.L vs. WRDA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGQD.L

FGQD.L Risk / Return Rank: 86
FGQD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
FGQD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
FGQD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 90
FGQD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
FGQD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 83

WRDA.L

WRDA.L Risk / Return Rank: 84
WRDA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
WRDA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
WRDA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 86
WRDA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
WRDA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGQD.L vs. WRDA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Global Quality Income ETF (FGQD.L) and UBS Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD Acc (WRDA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FGQD.L	WRDA.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.01	2.72	+0.29
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.09	3.72	+0.37
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.58	1.52	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.86	4.18	-0.32
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.82	16.68	+0.14
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FGQD.L vs. WRDA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGQD.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.01, which is comparable to the WRDA.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGQD.L and WRDA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FGQD.L	WRDA.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.01	2.72	+0.29
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.98	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.87	1.51	-0.64

Drawdowns

FGQD.L vs. WRDA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGQD.L drawdown since its inception was -26.43%, which is greater than WRDA.L's maximum drawdown of -18.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGQD.L and WRDA.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	FGQD.L	WRDA.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.43%	-18.38%	-8.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.93%	-6.53%	-0.40%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.90%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.90%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.12%	+0.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.90%	-2.27%	-0.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.59%	1.64%	-0.05%

Volatility

FGQD.L vs. WRDA.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Global Quality Income ETF (FGQD.L) is 1.88%, while UBS Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD Acc (WRDA.L) has a volatility of 2.49%. This indicates that FGQD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WRDA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FGQD.L	WRDA.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.88%	2.49%	-0.61%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.37%	7.16%	-0.79%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.89%	10.03%	-1.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.07%	12.34%	-0.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.61%	12.34%	+2.27%

FGQD.L vs. WRDA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGQD.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than WRDA.L's 0.06% expense ratio.

Dividends

FGQD.L vs. WRDA.L - Dividend Comparison

FGQD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.81%, while WRDA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FGQD.L Fidelity Global Quality Income ETF	1.81%	1.87%	2.31%	2.78%	2.69%	2.46%	2.60%	2.44%	2.70%	1.56%
WRDA.L UBS Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD Acc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FGQD.L and WRDA.L in my portfolio?

FGQD.L and WRDA.L have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FGQD.L or WRDA.L?

On fees, WRDA.L is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FGQD.L or WRDA.L?

WRDA.L is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for FGQD.L.

What is the main difference between FGQD.L and WRDA.L?

FGQD.L tracks Fidelity Global Quality Income index, while WRDA.L tracks MSCI World Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for FGQD.L and 0.06% for WRDA.L.