PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FGOVX vs. FGMNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FGOVX vs. FGMNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Government Income Fund (FGOVX) and Fidelity GNMA Fund (FGMNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGOVX achieves a 0.22% return, which is significantly lower than FGMNX's 1.09% return. Over the past 10 years, FGOVX has underperformed FGMNX with an annualized return of 0.80%, while FGMNX has yielded a comparatively higher 1.23% annualized return.


FGOVX

1D
0.11%
1M
-0.12%
YTD
0.22%
6M
0.56%
1Y
4.32%
3Y*
3.00%
5Y*
-0.56%
10Y*
0.80%

FGMNX

1D
0.19%
1M
-0.17%
YTD
1.09%
6M
1.47%
1Y
6.36%
3Y*
4.25%
5Y*
0.30%
10Y*
1.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGOVX vs. FGMNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FGOVX
Fidelity Government Income Fund
0.22%6.57%0.09%4.23%-13.09%-2.25%6.79%6.41%0.63%2.22%
FGMNX
Fidelity GNMA Fund
1.09%7.89%0.43%5.46%-11.52%-1.03%3.74%5.72%0.62%1.74%

Correlation

The correlation between FGOVX and FGMNX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 1985

0.84

The correlation between FGOVX and FGMNX shifts across timeframes, from 0.84 (all time) to 0.96 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FGOVX vs. FGMNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGOVX
FGOVX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
FGOVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGOVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGOVX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
FGOVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGOVX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

FGMNX
FGMNX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
FGMNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGMNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGMNX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
FGMNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGMNX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGOVX vs. FGMNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Government Income Fund (FGOVX) and Fidelity GNMA Fund (FGMNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FGOVXFGMNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.29

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.34

2.39

-1.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.03

7.66

-3.63

FGOVX vs. FGMNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGOVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.08, which is lower than the FGMNX Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGOVX and FGMNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FGOVXFGMNXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.08

1.61

-0.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.09

0.05

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

0.26

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

1.04

-0.32

Drawdowns

FGOVX vs. FGMNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGOVX drawdown since its inception was -19.93%, which is greater than FGMNX's maximum drawdown of -16.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGOVX and FGMNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FGOVXFGMNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.93%

-16.84%

-3.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.06%

-2.54%

-0.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.33%

-7.23%

+0.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.00%

-16.54%

-1.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.93%

-16.84%

-3.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.79%

-1.09%

-5.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.93%

-1.91%

-2.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.02%

0.79%

+0.23%

Volatility

FGOVX vs. FGMNX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Government Income Fund (FGOVX) and Fidelity GNMA Fund (FGMNX) have volatilities of 1.29% and 1.32%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FGOVXFGMNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.29%

1.32%

-0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.72%

2.67%

+0.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.85%

3.81%

+0.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.09%

6.25%

-0.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.04%

4.67%

+0.37%

FGOVX vs. FGMNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FGOVX and FGMNX have an expense ratio of 0.45%.


Dividends

FGOVX vs. FGMNX - Dividend Comparison

FGOVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.48%, less than FGMNX's 3.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FGMNX
Fidelity GNMA Fund
3.62%3.61%3.23%3.45%1.68%0.76%1.61%2.46%2.19%2.17%2.61%2.25%
FGOVX
Fidelity Government Income Fund
3.48%3.37%3.20%2.57%1.13%0.60%2.39%2.10%2.08%1.81%2.69%2.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, FGOVX and FGMNX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FGMNX has higher volatility (1.32%) compared to FGOVX (1.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGOVX dropped -19.93% vs FGMNX's -16.84%.

FGMNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FGOVX and FGMNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer