FGOMX vs. FSPSX
Compare and contrast key facts about Strategic Advisers Fidelity Emerging Markets Fund (FGOMX) and Fidelity International Index Fund (FSPSX).
FGOMX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Oct 29, 2018. FSPSX is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI ex USA IMI Index. It was launched on Nov 5, 1997.
Performance
FGOMX vs. FSPSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FGOMX vs. FSPSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGOMX Strategic Advisers Fidelity Emerging Markets Fund | 1.70% | 34.20% | 7.88% | 12.23% | -22.45% | -0.19% | 22.10% | 22.25% | -4.83% |
FSPSX Fidelity International Index Fund | -1.94% | 31.98% | 3.70% | 18.31% | -14.23% | 11.45% | 8.16% | 22.03% | -5.95% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FGOMX achieves a 1.70% return, which is significantly higher than FSPSX's -1.94% return.
FGOMX
- 1D
- -1.28%
- 1M
- -12.06%
- YTD
- 1.70%
- 6M
- 6.93%
- 1Y
- 32.01%
- 3Y*
- 16.27%
- 5Y*
- 4.27%
- 10Y*
- —
FSPSX
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- -10.86%
- YTD
- -1.94%
- 6M
- 2.58%
- 1Y
- 19.89%
- 3Y*
- 13.50%
- 5Y*
- 7.96%
- 10Y*
- 8.65%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FGOMX vs. FSPSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FGOMX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than FSPSX's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
FGOMX vs. FSPSX — Risk / Return Rank
FGOMX
FSPSX
FGOMX vs. FSPSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strategic Advisers Fidelity Emerging Markets Fund (FGOMX) and Fidelity International Index Fund (FSPSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FGOMX | FSPSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.74 | 1.11 | +0.62 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.44 | 1.56 | +0.88 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.23 | +0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.49 | 1.54 | +0.94 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.01 | 5.93 | +4.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FGOMX | FSPSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.74 | 1.11 | +0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 | 0.51 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.53 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.46 | 0.00 |
Correlation
The correlation between FGOMX and FSPSX is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FGOMX vs. FSPSX - Dividend Comparison
FGOMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.13%, less than FSPSX's 3.22% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGOMX Strategic Advisers Fidelity Emerging Markets Fund | 2.13% | 2.17% | 2.40% | 2.83% | 2.42% | 4.63% | 0.73% | 2.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FSPSX Fidelity International Index Fund | 3.22% | 3.15% | 3.27% | 2.79% | 2.66% | 3.07% | 1.84% | 3.18% | 2.79% | 2.50% | 3.08% | 2.79% |
Drawdowns
FGOMX vs. FSPSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FGOMX drawdown since its inception was -40.14%, which is greater than FSPSX's maximum drawdown of -33.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGOMX and FSPSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FGOMX | FSPSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.14% | -33.69% | -6.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.77% | -11.39% | -1.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.04% | -29.41% | -8.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.77% | -10.86% | -1.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.60% | -6.59% | -7.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.54% | 2.96% | +0.58% |
Volatility
FGOMX vs. FSPSX - Volatility Comparison
Strategic Advisers Fidelity Emerging Markets Fund (FGOMX) has a higher volatility of 8.14% compared to Fidelity International Index Fund (FSPSX) at 7.04%. This indicates that FGOMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSPSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FGOMX | FSPSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.14% | 7.04% | +1.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.92% | 10.63% | +2.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.18% | 16.79% | +3.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.38% | 15.77% | +1.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.13% | 16.47% | +2.66% |