PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FGNSX vs. GCMFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FGNSX vs. GCMFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Strategic Advisers Tax-Sensitive Short Duration Fund (FGNSX) and PIMCO California Municipal Opportunistic Value Fund (GCMFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FGNSX having a 0.82% return and GCMFX slightly lower at 0.79%.


FGNSX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.20%
6M
0.62%
YTD
0.82%
1Y
1.90%
3Y*
3.06%
5Y*
2.09%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
1.76%

GCMFX

1D
-0.10%
1M
-1.83%
6M
0.50%
YTD
0.79%
1Y
5.39%
3Y*
2.86%
5Y*
1.48%
10Y*
1.89%
ALL TIME*
1.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FGNSX vs. GCMFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FGNSX
Strategic Advisers Tax-Sensitive Short Duration Fund
0.82%3.08%3.47%3.56%-0.36%0.14%1.04%2.11%1.47%-0.10%
GCMFX
PIMCO California Municipal Opportunistic Value Fund
0.79%2.76%2.24%5.22%-3.47%1.76%2.69%5.06%1.83%0.28%

Correlation

The correlation between FGNSX and GCMFX is 0.36, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 28, 2017

0.46

The correlation between FGNSX and GCMFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (1 year) to 0.49 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FGNSX vs. GCMFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FGNSX
FGNSX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
FGNSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGNSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGNSX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
FGNSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGNSX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

GCMFX
GCMFX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
GCMFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GCMFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
GCMFX Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
GCMFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
GCMFX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FGNSX vs. GCMFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strategic Advisers Tax-Sensitive Short Duration Fund (FGNSX) and PIMCO California Municipal Opportunistic Value Fund (GCMFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FGNSXGCMFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.18

1.57

+0.62

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.41

2.58

+1.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.64

9.03

+9.60

FGNSX vs. GCMFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGNSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.25, which is comparable to the GCMFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGNSX and GCMFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FGNSX vs. GCMFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGNSX drawdown since its inception was -2.35%, smaller than the maximum GCMFX drawdown of -7.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGNSX and GCMFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FGNSXGCMFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.35%

-7.08%

+4.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.50%

-2.24%

+1.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.35%

-4.96%

+2.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-2.35%

-7.08%

+4.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-7.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.20%

-1.83%

+1.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.24%

-1.02%

+0.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.11%

0.64%

-0.53%

Volatility

FGNSX vs. GCMFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Strategic Advisers Tax-Sensitive Short Duration Fund (FGNSX) is 0.25%, while PIMCO California Municipal Opportunistic Value Fund (GCMFX) has a volatility of 0.76%. This indicates that FGNSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GCMFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FGNSXGCMFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.25%

0.76%

-0.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.68%

2.05%

-1.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.01%

2.57%

-1.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.06%

3.23%

-1.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.64%

2.78%

-1.14%

FGNSX vs. GCMFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGNSX has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than GCMFX's 0.63% expense ratio.


Dividends

FGNSX vs. GCMFX - Dividend Comparison

FGNSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%, less than GCMFX's 3.17% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FGNSX
Strategic Advisers Tax-Sensitive Short Duration Fund
2.08%2.63%3.31%2.57%0.84%0.34%0.83%1.79%1.36%0.00%0.00%
GCMFX
PIMCO California Municipal Opportunistic Value Fund
3.17%3.39%3.34%2.59%1.91%2.34%2.65%2.56%2.40%1.51%0.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


FGNSX and GCMFX have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GCMFX has higher volatility (0.76%) compared to FGNSX (0.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGNSX dropped -2.35% vs GCMFX's -7.08%.

GCMFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 2.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FGNSX and GCMFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer