FGNSX vs. DFSMX
Compare and contrast key facts about Strategic Advisers Tax-Sensitive Short Duration Fund (FGNSX) and DFA Short Term Municipal Bond Portfolio (DFSMX).
FGNSX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Dec 27, 2017. DFSMX is managed by Dimensional. It was launched on Aug 19, 2002.
Performance
FGNSX vs. DFSMX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FGNSX vs. DFSMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGNSX Strategic Advisers Tax-Sensitive Short Duration Fund | -0.10% | 3.08% | 3.47% | 3.56% | -0.36% | 0.14% | 1.04% | 2.11% | 1.47% | -0.10% |
DFSMX DFA Short Term Municipal Bond Portfolio | 0.55% | 2.30% | 2.84% | 2.98% | -0.36% | -0.11% | 0.83% | 1.62% | 1.22% | 0.00% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FGNSX achieves a -0.10% return, which is significantly lower than DFSMX's 0.55% return.
FGNSX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.40%
- YTD
- -0.10%
- 6M
- 0.34%
- 1Y
- 1.98%
- 3Y*
- 2.99%
- 5Y*
- 1.93%
- 10Y*
- —
DFSMX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.05%
- YTD
- 0.55%
- 6M
- 1.10%
- 1Y
- 2.45%
- 3Y*
- 2.60%
- 5Y*
- 1.61%
- 10Y*
- 1.23%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FGNSX vs. DFSMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FGNSX has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than DFSMX's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
FGNSX vs. DFSMX — Risk / Return Rank
FGNSX
DFSMX
FGNSX vs. DFSMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strategic Advisers Tax-Sensitive Short Duration Fund (FGNSX) and DFA Short Term Municipal Bond Portfolio (DFSMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FGNSX | DFSMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.64 | 3.68 | -3.03 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.92 | 6.50 | -5.57 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 3.20 | -1.79 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.07 | 4.59 | -3.52 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.74 | 21.82 | -19.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FGNSX | DFSMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 | 3.68 | -3.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 | 2.08 | -1.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.60 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.06 | 1.78 | -0.72 |
Correlation
The correlation between FGNSX and DFSMX is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
FGNSX vs. DFSMX - Dividend Comparison
FGNSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.86%, less than DFSMX's 2.43% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGNSX Strategic Advisers Tax-Sensitive Short Duration Fund | 1.86% | 2.63% | 3.31% | 2.57% | 0.84% | 0.34% | 0.83% | 1.79% | 1.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DFSMX DFA Short Term Municipal Bond Portfolio | 2.43% | 2.08% | 2.80% | 1.94% | 0.63% | 0.19% | 0.83% | 1.22% | 1.11% | 0.95% | 0.94% | 0.95% |
Drawdowns
FGNSX vs. DFSMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FGNSX drawdown since its inception was -2.35%, smaller than the maximum DFSMX drawdown of -2.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGNSX and DFSMX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FGNSX | DFSMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.35% | -2.66% | +0.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.35% | -0.39% | -1.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -2.35% | -1.67% | -0.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -1.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.50% | -0.06% | -0.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.25% | -0.24% | -0.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.92% | 0.10% | +0.82% |
Volatility
FGNSX vs. DFSMX - Volatility Comparison
Strategic Advisers Tax-Sensitive Short Duration Fund (FGNSX) has a higher volatility of 0.23% compared to DFA Short Term Municipal Bond Portfolio (DFSMX) at 0.11%. This indicates that FGNSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFSMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FGNSX | DFSMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.23% | 0.11% | +0.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.66% | 0.35% | +0.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.85% | 0.68% | +3.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.04% | 0.78% | +1.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.66% | 0.77% | +0.89% |