FGM vs. EUDV
FGM (First Trust Germany AlphaDEX Fund) and EUDV (ProShares MSCI Europe Dividend Growers ETF) are both Europe Equities funds - FGM tracks the NASDAQ AlphaDEX Germany Index while EUDV tracks the MSCI Europe Dividend Masters Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FGM returned 8.09%/yr vs 5.17%/yr for EUDV. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FGM charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for EUDV.
Performance
FGM vs. EUDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FGM achieves a 4.13% return, which is significantly higher than EUDV's 1.21% return. Over the past 10 years, FGM has outperformed EUDV with an annualized return of 8.09%, while EUDV has yielded a comparatively lower 5.17% annualized return.
FGM
- 1D
- -1.22%
- 1M
- 2.88%
- YTD
- 4.13%
- 6M
- 9.75%
- 1Y
- 19.41%
- 3Y*
- 22.05%
- 5Y*
- 4.19%
- 10Y*
- 8.09%
EUDV
- 1D
- -1.30%
- 1M
- -0.65%
- YTD
- 1.21%
- 6M
- 2.16%
- 1Y
- -0.12%
- 3Y*
- 7.36%
- 5Y*
- 2.28%
- 10Y*
- 5.17%
FGM vs. EUDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGM First Trust Germany AlphaDEX Fund | 4.13% | 63.60% | 1.36% | 13.28% | -30.46% | 6.10% | 17.26% | 20.77% | -25.14% | 44.28% |
EUDV ProShares MSCI Europe Dividend Growers ETF | 1.21% | 14.05% | 0.03% | 20.41% | -24.87% | 19.56% | 5.81% | 25.89% | -11.12% | 21.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between FGM and EUDV is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2015 | 0.66 |
The correlation between FGM and EUDV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.
FGM vs. EUDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FGM
EUDV
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
-
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Financial Services
Healthcare
Communication Services
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Energy
-
Technology
-
Industrials
FGM
EUDV
Consumer Cyclical
FGM
EUDV
-
Real Estate
FGM
EUDV
Basic Materials
FGM
EUDV
Financial Services
FGM
EUDV
Healthcare
FGM
EUDV
Communication Services
FGM
EUDV
Utilities
FGM
EUDV
Consumer Defensive
FGM
EUDV
Energy
FGM
-
EUDV
Technology
FGM
-
EUDV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FGM vs. EUDV — Risk / Return Rank
FGM
EUDV
FGM vs. EUDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Germany AlphaDEX Fund (FGM) and ProShares MSCI Europe Dividend Growers ETF (EUDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FGM | EUDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.01 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.10 | -0.01 | +1.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.48 | -0.03 | +3.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FGM | EUDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 | -0.01 | +0.96 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 | 0.14 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 | 0.30 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.27 | +0.08 |
Drawdowns
FGM vs. EUDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FGM drawdown since its inception was -51.58%, which is greater than EUDV's maximum drawdown of -37.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGM and EUDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FGM | EUDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.58% | -37.51% | -14.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.76% | -10.63% | -7.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.93% | -13.69% | -4.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.07% | -37.51% | -13.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.58% | -37.51% | -14.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.43% | -4.67% | -2.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.74% | -8.61% | -6.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.59% | 4.22% | +1.37% |
Volatility
FGM vs. EUDV - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Germany AlphaDEX Fund (FGM) has a higher volatility of 7.14% compared to ProShares MSCI Europe Dividend Growers ETF (EUDV) at 4.55%. This indicates that FGM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EUDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FGM | EUDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.14% | 4.55% | +2.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.09% | 11.16% | +5.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.51% | 14.06% | +6.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.48% | 16.14% | +8.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.11% | 17.42% | +5.69% |
FGM vs. EUDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
FGM has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than EUDV's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
FGM vs. EUDV - Dividend Comparison
FGM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%, less than EUDV's 1.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EUDV ProShares MSCI Europe Dividend Growers ETF | 1.71% | 1.74% | 1.92% | 1.87% | 1.77% | 2.30% | 1.27% | 2.20% | 2.22% | 2.33% | 2.53% | 0.37% |
FGM First Trust Germany AlphaDEX Fund | 0.64% | 0.66% | 2.56% | 2.82% | 5.44% | 1.43% | 1.33% | 2.30% | 2.18% | 2.11% | 1.33% | 1.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FGM and EUDV have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FGM has higher volatility (7.14%) compared to EUDV (4.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGM dropped -51.58% vs EUDV's -37.51%.
On 10-year performance, FGM leads with 8.09% vs 5.17% for EUDV. On fees, EUDV is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, EUDV has been the lower-risk option at 4.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, FGM has performed better with a 8.09% return vs 5.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EUDV is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FGM.
EUDV has the higher dividend yield at 1.71%, compared with 0.64% for FGM.
FGM tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Germany Index, while EUDV tracks MSCI Europe Dividend Masters Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for FGM and 0.55% for EUDV.
FGM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.95 vs -0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FGM and EUDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer