PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FGLS.L vs. MWRD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FGLS.L vs. MWRD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Fidelity Sustainable Research Enhanced Global Equity UCITS ETF Acc (FGLS.L) and Amundi Index MSCI World (MWRD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FGLS.L is traded in GBP, while MWRD.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the MWRD.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period


FGLS.L

1D
-0.29%
1M
4.50%
YTD
8.94%
6M
9.24%
1Y
24.94%
3Y*
15.95%
5Y*
11.85%
10Y*

MWRD.L

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGLS.L vs. MWRD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
FGLS.L
Fidelity Sustainable Research Enhanced Global Equity UCITS ETF Acc
8.94%10.06%19.92%17.58%-9.61%23.93%12.54%
MWRD.L
Amundi Index MSCI World
0.00%0.00%-1.27%17.50%-9.18%24.39%12.10%

Correlation

The correlation between FGLS.L and MWRD.L is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2020

0.75

The correlation between FGLS.L and MWRD.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (3 years) to 0.75 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FGLS.L vs. MWRD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FGLS.L
MWRD.L

Technology

31.2%
24.7%

Financial Services

16.7%
14.7%

Communication Services

10.8%
7.5%

Industrials

9.6%
10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

9.2%
10.5%

Healthcare

9.0%
12.4%

Consumer Defensive

4.5%
6.7%

Energy

2.9%
4.4%

Basic Materials

2.8%
3.8%

Real Estate

1.7%
2.4%

Utilities

1.7%
2.4%

Technology

FGLS.L
31.2%
MWRD.L
24.7%

Financial Services

FGLS.L
16.7%
MWRD.L
14.7%

Communication Services

FGLS.L
10.8%
MWRD.L
7.5%

Industrials

FGLS.L
9.6%
MWRD.L
10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

FGLS.L
9.2%
MWRD.L
10.5%

Healthcare

FGLS.L
9.0%
MWRD.L
12.4%

Consumer Defensive

FGLS.L
4.5%
MWRD.L
6.7%

Energy

FGLS.L
2.9%
MWRD.L
4.4%

Basic Materials

FGLS.L
2.8%
MWRD.L
3.8%

Real Estate

FGLS.L
1.7%
MWRD.L
2.4%

Utilities

FGLS.L
1.7%
MWRD.L
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FGLS.L vs. MWRD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGLS.L
FGLS.L Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
FGLS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGLS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGLS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
FGLS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGLS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

MWRD.L
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGLS.L vs. MWRD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Sustainable Research Enhanced Global Equity UCITS ETF Acc (FGLS.L) and Amundi Index MSCI World (MWRD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FGLS.LMWRD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.71

FGLS.L vs. MWRD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FGLS.LMWRD.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.99

Drawdowns

FGLS.L vs. MWRD.L - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FGLS.LMWRD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.81%

Volatility

FGLS.L vs. MWRD.L - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FGLS.LMWRD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.75%

FGLS.L vs. MWRD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGLS.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than MWRD.L's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

FGLS.L vs. MWRD.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither FGLS.L nor MWRD.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


FGLS.L and MWRD.L have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MWRD.L is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MWRD.L is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for FGLS.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for FGLS.L and 0.08% for MWRD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FGLS.L and MWRD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer