FGLS.L vs. CHRG.L
FGLS.L (Fidelity Sustainable Research Enhanced Global Equity UCITS ETF Acc) and CHRG.L (WisdomTree Battery Solutions UCITS ETF - USD Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - FGLS.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD, while CHRG.L is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree Battery Solutions Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FGLS.L returned 11.85%/yr vs 6.01%/yr for CHRG.L. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FGLS.L charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for CHRG.L.
Performance
FGLS.L vs. CHRG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
FGLS.L is traded in GBP, while CHRG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CHRG.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FGLS.L achieves a 8.94% return, which is significantly lower than CHRG.L's 34.75% return.
FGLS.L
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 4.50%
- YTD
- 8.94%
- 6M
- 9.24%
- 1Y
- 24.94%
- 3Y*
- 15.95%
- 5Y*
- 11.85%
- 10Y*
- —
CHRG.L
- 1D
- -1.90%
- 1M
- 6.41%
- YTD
- 34.75%
- 6M
- 34.20%
- 1Y
- 109.23%
- 3Y*
- 14.83%
- 5Y*
- 6.01%
- 10Y*
- —
FGLS.L vs. CHRG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGLS.L Fidelity Sustainable Research Enhanced Global Equity UCITS ETF Acc | 8.94% | 10.06% | 19.92% | 17.58% | -9.61% | 23.93% | 12.54% |
CHRG.L WisdomTree Battery Solutions UCITS ETF - USD Acc | 34.75% | 44.29% | -11.91% | -9.67% | -19.10% | 14.89% | 67.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between FGLS.L and CHRG.L is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2020 | 0.60 |
The correlation between FGLS.L and CHRG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.
FGLS.L vs. CHRG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FGLS.L
CHRG.L
Technology
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
-
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Utilities
Technology
FGLS.L
CHRG.L
Financial Services
FGLS.L
CHRG.L
-
Communication Services
FGLS.L
CHRG.L
-
Industrials
FGLS.L
CHRG.L
Consumer Cyclical
FGLS.L
CHRG.L
Healthcare
FGLS.L
CHRG.L
-
Consumer Defensive
FGLS.L
CHRG.L
Energy
FGLS.L
CHRG.L
Basic Materials
FGLS.L
CHRG.L
Real Estate
FGLS.L
CHRG.L
-
Utilities
FGLS.L
CHRG.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FGLS.L vs. CHRG.L — Risk / Return Rank
FGLS.L
CHRG.L
FGLS.L vs. CHRG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Sustainable Research Enhanced Global Equity UCITS ETF Acc (FGLS.L) and WisdomTree Battery Solutions UCITS ETF - USD Acc (CHRG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FGLS.L | CHRG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.55 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.37 | 3.66 | -0.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.71 | 6.77 | +6.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FGLS.L | CHRG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.37 | 2.08 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 | 0.20 | +0.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.99 | 0.53 | +0.46 |
Drawdowns
FGLS.L vs. CHRG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FGLS.L drawdown since its inception was -19.90%, smaller than the maximum CHRG.L drawdown of -52.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGLS.L and CHRG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FGLS.L | CHRG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.90% | -52.64% | +32.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.36% | -29.68% | +22.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.90% | -39.46% | +19.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.90% | -52.64% | +32.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.29% | -2.67% | +2.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.15% | -22.35% | +19.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.81% | 16.07% | -14.26% |
Volatility
FGLS.L vs. CHRG.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Sustainable Research Enhanced Global Equity UCITS ETF Acc (FGLS.L) is 2.61%, while WisdomTree Battery Solutions UCITS ETF - USD Acc (CHRG.L) has a volatility of 10.38%. This indicates that FGLS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHRG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FGLS.L | CHRG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.61% | 10.38% | -7.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.59% | 19.04% | -11.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.50% | 52.32% | -41.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.40% | 30.08% | -16.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.75% | 29.55% | -15.80% |
FGLS.L vs. CHRG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
FGLS.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than CHRG.L's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
FGLS.L vs. CHRG.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither FGLS.L nor CHRG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
FGLS.L and CHRG.L have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FGLS.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FGLS.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for CHRG.L.
FGLS.L is categorized as Global Equities, while CHRG.L is Alternative Energy Equities. FGLS.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while CHRG.L tracks WisdomTree Battery Solutions Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for FGLS.L and 0.40% for CHRG.L.
Find the right allocation for FGLS.L and CHRG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer