FGKMX vs. FBGRX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

FGKMX (Fidelity Advisor Communication Services Class Z) and FBGRX (Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - FGKMX is a Communications Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while FBGRX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 5 years, FGKMX returned 13.94%/yr vs 16.60%/yr for FBGRX. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FGKMX charges 0.62%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for FBGRX.

Performance

FGKMX vs. FBGRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Communication Services Class Z (FGKMX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGKMX achieves a 10.78% return, which is significantly lower than FBGRX's 17.66% return.

FGKMX

• 1D: -1.12%
• 1M: 3.46%
• YTD: 10.78%
• 6M: 12.68%
• 1Y: 41.20%
• 3Y*: 33.95%
• 5Y*: 13.94%
• 10Y*: —

FBGRX

• 1D: 0.86%
• 1M: 8.31%
• YTD: 17.66%
• 6M: 18.83%
• 1Y: 45.12%
• 3Y*: 32.21%
• 5Y*: 16.60%
• 10Y*: 21.79%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGKMX vs. FBGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FGKMX Fidelity Advisor Communication Services Class Z	10.78%	36.91%	33.04%	57.12%	-38.20%	16.12%	35.66%	33.34%	-7.39%
FBGRX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund	17.66%	19.91%	39.77%	55.61%	-38.45%	22.64%	62.20%	33.43%	-5.94%

Correlation

The correlation between FGKMX and FBGRX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.78
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.82
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2018	0.86

The correlation between FGKMX and FBGRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FGKMX vs. FBGRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGKMX

FGKMX Risk / Return Rank: 51
FGKMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
FGKMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
FGKMX Omega Ratio Rank: 51
FGKMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
FGKMX Martin Ratio Rank: 47

FBGRX

FBGRX Risk / Return Rank: 75
FBGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
FBGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
FBGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
FBGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
FBGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGKMX vs. FBGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Communication Services Class Z (FGKMX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FGKMX	FBGRX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.26	2.67	-0.41
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.05	3.42	-0.38
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.45	-0.06
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.57	3.62	-1.05
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.77	15.38	-5.62
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FGKMX vs. FBGRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGKMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is comparable to the FBGRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGKMX and FBGRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FGKMX	FBGRX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.26	2.67	-0.41
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.60	0.67	-0.07
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.92	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.82	0.68	+0.14

Drawdowns

FGKMX vs. FBGRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGKMX drawdown since its inception was -47.32%, smaller than the maximum FBGRX drawdown of -58.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGKMX and FBGRX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FGKMX	FBGRX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-47.32%	-58.64%	+11.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.89%	-12.65%	-4.24%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.19%	-27.07%	+3.88%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-47.32%	-43.08%	-4.24%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-43.08%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.39%	0.00%	-2.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.71%	-12.53%	+1.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.45%	2.98%	+1.47%

Volatility

FGKMX vs. FBGRX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Communication Services Class Z (FGKMX) has a higher volatility of 4.62% compared to Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX) at 4.14%. This indicates that FGKMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FGKMX	FBGRX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.62%	4.14%	+0.48%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.89%	12.99%	+0.90%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.03%	17.46%	+1.57%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.25%	24.88%	-1.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.95%	23.69%	+0.26%

FGKMX vs. FBGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGKMX has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is lower than FBGRX's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

FGKMX vs. FBGRX - Dividend Comparison

FGKMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.16%, more than FBGRX's 1.61% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FBGRX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund	1.61%	1.90%	5.95%	0.93%	0.57%	8.73%	6.40%	3.70%	6.32%	4.23%	4.05%	5.30%
FGKMX Fidelity Advisor Communication Services Class Z	12.16%	7.92%	4.85%	0.00%	0.00%	5.92%	3.73%	35.55%	8.88%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FGKMX and FBGRX in my portfolio?

FGKMX and FBGRX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FGKMX or FBGRX?

FGKMX has higher volatility (4.62%) compared to FBGRX (4.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGKMX dropped -47.32% vs FBGRX's -58.64%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FBGRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 2.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.