PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FGKMX vs. FBMPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FGKMX vs. FBMPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Communication Services Class Z (FGKMX) and Fidelity Select Communication Services Portfolio (FBMPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FGKMX having a 10.78% return and FBMPX slightly lower at 10.75%.


FGKMX

1D
-1.12%
1M
3.46%
YTD
10.78%
6M
12.68%
1Y
41.20%
3Y*
33.95%
5Y*
13.94%
10Y*

FBMPX

1D
-1.13%
1M
3.45%
YTD
10.75%
6M
12.64%
1Y
41.10%
3Y*
34.92%
5Y*
14.37%
10Y*
17.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGKMX vs. FBMPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FGKMX
Fidelity Advisor Communication Services Class Z
10.78%36.91%33.04%57.12%-38.20%16.12%35.66%33.34%-7.39%
FBMPX
Fidelity Select Communication Services Portfolio
10.75%37.07%35.98%56.85%-38.30%15.97%35.48%33.14%-7.39%

Correlation

The correlation between FGKMX and FBMPX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2018

1.00

The correlation between FGKMX and FBMPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FGKMX vs. FBMPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGKMX
FGKMX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
FGKMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGKMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGKMX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
FGKMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGKMX Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

FBMPX
FBMPX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
FBMPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBMPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBMPX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
FBMPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBMPX Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGKMX vs. FBMPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Communication Services Class Z (FGKMX) and Fidelity Select Communication Services Portfolio (FBMPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FGKMXFBMPXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.26

2.26

+0.01

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.05

3.04

+0.01

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.39

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.57

2.57

+0.01

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.77

9.74

+0.03

FGKMX vs. FBMPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGKMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is comparable to the FBMPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGKMX and FBMPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FGKMXFBMPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.26

2.26

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

0.62

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.82

0.65

+0.17

Drawdowns

FGKMX vs. FBMPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGKMX drawdown since its inception was -47.32%, smaller than the maximum FBMPX drawdown of -61.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGKMX and FBMPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FGKMXFBMPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.32%

-61.77%

+14.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.89%

-16.90%

+0.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.19%

-23.20%

+0.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.32%

-47.42%

+0.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.39%

-2.38%

-0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.71%

-10.63%

-0.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.45%

4.45%

0.00%

Volatility

FGKMX vs. FBMPX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Communication Services Class Z (FGKMX) and Fidelity Select Communication Services Portfolio (FBMPX) have volatilities of 4.62% and 4.62%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FGKMXFBMPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.62%

4.62%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.89%

13.89%

0.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.03%

19.02%

+0.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.25%

23.25%

0.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.95%

21.96%

+1.99%

FGKMX vs. FBMPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGKMX has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is lower than FBMPX's 0.74% expense ratio.


Dividends

FGKMX vs. FBMPX - Dividend Comparison

FGKMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.16%, which matches FBMPX's 12.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FBMPX
Fidelity Select Communication Services Portfolio
12.09%8.09%7.05%0.00%0.00%5.88%3.74%35.43%15.29%5.53%7.50%7.29%
FGKMX
Fidelity Advisor Communication Services Class Z
12.16%7.92%4.85%0.00%0.00%5.92%3.73%35.55%8.88%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, FGKMX and FBMPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FBMPX has higher volatility (4.62%) compared to FGKMX (4.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGKMX dropped -47.32% vs FBMPX's -61.77%.

FGKMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 2.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FGKMX and FBMPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer