PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FGKFX vs. PCLIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FGKFX vs. PCLIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Growth Company K6 Fund (FGKFX) and PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy Fund (PCLIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGKFX achieves a 16.95% return, which is significantly lower than PCLIX's 34.47% return.


FGKFX

1D
0.89%
1M
-3.57%
6M
12.65%
YTD
16.95%
1Y
31.84%
3Y*
26.93%
5Y*
14.81%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
23.46%

PCLIX

1D
0.12%
1M
9.99%
6M
30.10%
YTD
34.47%
1Y
39.18%
3Y*
13.98%
5Y*
15.45%
10Y*
12.84%
ALL TIME*
5.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FGKFX vs. PCLIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FGKFX
Fidelity Growth Company K6 Fund
16.95%21.67%35.46%46.02%-32.62%22.06%68.76%15.07%
PCLIX
PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy Fund
34.47%5.76%8.53%0.69%23.32%43.83%-9.18%11.01%

Correlation

The correlation between FGKFX and PCLIX is -0.10, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2019

0.15

The correlation between FGKFX and PCLIX shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.15 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FGKFX vs. PCLIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FGKFX
FGKFX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
FGKFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGKFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGKFX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
FGKFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGKFX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

PCLIX
PCLIX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
PCLIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PCLIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
PCLIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
PCLIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
PCLIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FGKFX vs. PCLIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Growth Company K6 Fund (FGKFX) and PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy Fund (PCLIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FGKFXPCLIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.32

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.55

2.45

+0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.66

8.24

+0.42

FGKFX vs. PCLIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGKFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is comparable to the PCLIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGKFX and PCLIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FGKFX vs. PCLIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGKFX drawdown since its inception was -40.14%, smaller than the maximum PCLIX drawdown of -66.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGKFX and PCLIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FGKFXPCLIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.14%

-66.60%

+26.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.40%

-15.39%

+3.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.38%

-15.39%

-11.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.14%

-21.59%

-18.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.38%

-6.33%

-0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.87%

-24.00%

+14.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.34%

4.61%

-1.27%

Volatility

FGKFX vs. PCLIX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Growth Company K6 Fund (FGKFX) has a higher volatility of 6.49% compared to PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy Fund (PCLIX) at 5.97%. This indicates that FGKFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PCLIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FGKFXPCLIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.49%

5.97%

+0.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.20%

17.86%

-1.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.90%

19.99%

+0.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.48%

19.47%

+5.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.75%

40.51%

-14.76%

FGKFX vs. PCLIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGKFX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than PCLIX's 0.98% expense ratio.


Dividends

FGKFX vs. PCLIX - Dividend Comparison

FGKFX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PCLIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.36%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FGKFX
Fidelity Growth Company K6 Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.10%0.18%2.64%0.93%0.06%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PCLIX
PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy Fund
10.36%2.45%7.50%5.06%42.60%73.41%0.77%2.46%18.58%12.63%0.16%2.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


FGKFX and PCLIX have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FGKFX has higher volatility (6.49%) compared to PCLIX (5.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGKFX dropped -40.14% vs PCLIX's -66.60%.

PCLIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FGKFX and PCLIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer