FGIYX vs. GGINX

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

FGIYX (Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund) and GGINX (Goldman Sachs Global Infrastructure Fund) are both Energy Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, FGIYX returned 10.34%/yr vs 10.72%/yr for GGINX. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FGIYX charges 0.97%/yr vs 1.10%/yr for GGINX.

Performance

FGIYX vs. GGINX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund (FGIYX) and Goldman Sachs Global Infrastructure Fund (GGINX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGIYX achieves a 14.31% return, which is significantly higher than GGINX's 11.95% return.

FGIYX

• 1D: 0.31%
• 1M: 2.19%
• 6M: 13.74%
• YTD: 14.31%
• 1Y: 19.16%
• 3Y*: 15.13%
• 5Y*: 10.34%
• 10Y*: 9.32%

GGINX

• 1D: 0.63%
• 1M: -0.63%
• 6M: 12.65%
• YTD: 11.95%
• 1Y: 15.67%
• 3Y*: 19.21%
• 5Y*: 10.72%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGIYX vs. GGINX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FGIYX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund	14.31%	18.08%	10.91%	8.90%	-6.10%	14.85%	-2.55%	36.57%	-7.70%	19.64%
GGINX Goldman Sachs Global Infrastructure Fund	11.95%	15.18%	28.43%	5.00%	-8.51%	16.49%	-3.81%	31.50%	-8.99%	11.75%

Correlation

The correlation between FGIYX and GGINX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.91
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017	0.94

The correlation between FGIYX and GGINX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FGIYX vs. GGINX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGIYX

FGIYX Risk / Return Rank: 74
FGIYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
FGIYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
FGIYX Omega Ratio Rank: 68
FGIYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
FGIYX Martin Ratio Rank: 73

GGINX

GGINX Risk / Return Rank: 53
GGINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
GGINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
GGINX Omega Ratio Rank: 41
GGINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
GGINX Martin Ratio Rank: 49

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGIYX vs. GGINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund (FGIYX) and Goldman Sachs Global Infrastructure Fund (GGINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FGIYX	GGINX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.88	1.50	+0.38
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.63	2.15	+0.48
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.26	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.34	2.99	+0.35
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.50	8.05	+2.45

FGIYX vs. GGINX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGIYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is comparable to the GGINX Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGIYX and GGINX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FGIYX vs. GGINX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGIYX drawdown since its inception was -49.18%, which is greater than GGINX's maximum drawdown of -35.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGIYX and GGINX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FGIYX	GGINX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-49.18%	-35.80%	-13.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.99%	-5.59%	-0.40%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.49%	-15.39%	+2.90%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.92%	-24.21%	+3.29%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.06%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.61%	-2.66%	+2.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.00%	-5.87%	-1.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.90%	2.07%	-0.17%

Volatility

FGIYX vs. GGINX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund (FGIYX) is 3.35%, while Goldman Sachs Global Infrastructure Fund (GGINX) has a volatility of 3.78%. This indicates that FGIYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GGINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FGIYX	GGINX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.35%	3.78%	-0.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.88%	9.13%	-0.25%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.63%	11.12%	-0.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.22%	19.75%	-6.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.29%	18.94%	-3.65%

FGIYX vs. GGINX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGIYX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than GGINX's 1.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

FGIYX vs. GGINX - Dividend Comparison

FGIYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.54%, more than GGINX's 6.11% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FGIYX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund	14.54%	10.28%	7.74%	2.51%	6.41%	7.48%	1.62%	12.32%	6.62%	6.10%	8.64%	3.31%
GGINX Goldman Sachs Global Infrastructure Fund	6.11%	6.26%	30.25%	2.67%	0.89%	1.86%	1.75%	2.04%	1.98%	2.53%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FGIYX and GGINX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, FGIYX and GGINX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FGIYX or GGINX?

GGINX has higher volatility (3.78%) compared to FGIYX (3.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGIYX dropped -49.18% vs GGINX's -35.80%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FGIYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.