FGIAX vs. FGILX
Compare and contrast key facts about Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX) and Fidelity Global Equity Income Fund (FGILX).
FGIAX is a passively managed fund by Nuveen that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Infrastructure Index NR. It was launched on Dec 17, 2007. FGILX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on May 2, 2012.
Performance
FGIAX vs. FGILX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FGIAX vs. FGILX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 9.53% | 17.73% | 10.70% | 8.51% | -6.23% | 14.51% | -2.76% | 29.32% | -7.91% | 19.40% |
FGILX Fidelity Global Equity Income Fund | -0.56% | 25.99% | 13.80% | 15.33% | -11.93% | 19.05% | 14.49% | 30.20% | -10.93% | 21.68% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FGIAX achieves a 9.53% return, which is significantly higher than FGILX's -0.56% return. Over the past 10 years, FGIAX has underperformed FGILX with an annualized return of 8.70%, while FGILX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.12% annualized return.
FGIAX
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- -3.78%
- YTD
- 9.53%
- 6M
- 10.02%
- 1Y
- 20.91%
- 3Y*
- 14.03%
- 5Y*
- 10.45%
- 10Y*
- 8.70%
FGILX
- 1D
- 2.78%
- 1M
- -5.43%
- YTD
- -0.56%
- 6M
- 2.45%
- 1Y
- 18.86%
- 3Y*
- 15.75%
- 5Y*
- 10.30%
- 10Y*
- 11.12%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FGIAX vs. FGILX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FGIAX has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is higher than FGILX's 1.02% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FGIAX vs. FGILX — Risk / Return Rank
FGIAX
FGILX
FGIAX vs. FGILX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX) and Fidelity Global Equity Income Fund (FGILX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FGIAX | FGILX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.75 | 1.29 | +0.46 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.26 | 1.84 | +0.42 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.29 | +0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.61 | 1.83 | +0.78 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.12 | 8.71 | +3.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FGIAX | FGILX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.75 | 1.29 | +0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 | 0.77 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | 0.77 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.78 | -0.37 |
Correlation
The correlation between FGIAX and FGILX is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FGIAX vs. FGILX - Dividend Comparison
FGIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.12%, more than FGILX's 2.07% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 9.12% | 9.99% | 7.46% | 2.27% | 6.11% | 7.20% | 1.38% | 7.06% | 6.32% | 5.83% | 8.23% | 3.05% |
FGILX Fidelity Global Equity Income Fund | 2.07% | 2.06% | 2.38% | 1.25% | 1.21% | 11.94% | 3.17% | 1.51% | 6.23% | 2.10% | 1.27% | 2.75% |
Drawdowns
FGIAX vs. FGILX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FGIAX drawdown since its inception was -49.35%, which is greater than FGILX's maximum drawdown of -30.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGIAX and FGILX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FGIAX | FGILX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.35% | -30.59% | -18.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.29% | -10.84% | +2.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.08% | -21.40% | +0.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.02% | -30.59% | -7.43% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.78% | -6.11% | +2.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.22% | -3.66% | -3.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.78% | 2.28% | -0.50% |
Volatility
FGIAX vs. FGILX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX) is 4.05%, while Fidelity Global Equity Income Fund (FGILX) has a volatility of 5.84%. This indicates that FGIAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FGILX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FGIAX | FGILX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.05% | 5.84% | -1.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.09% | 8.68% | -1.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.28% | 15.12% | -2.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.08% | 13.49% | -0.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.17% | 14.53% | +0.64% |