FGHMX vs. FZROX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Communication Services Class C (FGHMX) and Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index Fund (FZROX).
FGHMX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 30, 2018. FZROX is managed by Fidelity.
Performance
FGHMX vs. FZROX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FGHMX vs. FZROX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGHMX Fidelity Advisor Communication Services Class C | -7.77% | 34.91% | 34.57% | 55.30% | -38.91% | 14.78% | 34.11% | 31.72% | -7.48% |
FZROX Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index Fund | -3.98% | 17.23% | 23.94% | 26.20% | -19.21% | 26.00% | 20.51% | 31.15% | -9.95% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FGHMX achieves a -7.77% return, which is significantly lower than FZROX's -3.98% return.
FGHMX
- 1D
- 4.70%
- 1M
- -7.33%
- YTD
- -7.77%
- 6M
- -4.52%
- 1Y
- 30.15%
- 3Y*
- 29.09%
- 5Y*
- 10.35%
- 10Y*
- —
FZROX
- 1D
- 2.99%
- 1M
- -5.06%
- YTD
- -3.98%
- 6M
- -1.97%
- 1Y
- 17.77%
- 3Y*
- 17.96%
- 5Y*
- 10.74%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FGHMX vs. FZROX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FGHMX has a 1.78% expense ratio, which is higher than FZROX's 0.00% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FGHMX vs. FZROX — Risk / Return Rank
FGHMX
FZROX
FGHMX vs. FZROX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Communication Services Class C (FGHMX) and Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index Fund (FZROX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FGHMX | FZROX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.35 | 0.98 | +0.36 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.96 | 1.50 | +0.46 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.23 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.84 | 1.51 | +0.33 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.93 | 7.28 | -0.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FGHMX | FZROX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.35 | 0.98 | +0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | 0.62 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 0.63 | +0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between FGHMX and FZROX is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FGHMX vs. FZROX - Dividend Comparison
FGHMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.77%, more than FZROX's 1.07% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGHMX Fidelity Advisor Communication Services Class C | 7.77% | 7.17% | 7.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.54% | 3.81% | 35.35% | 8.76% |
FZROX Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index Fund | 1.07% | 1.02% | 1.16% | 1.36% | 1.57% | 1.25% | 1.27% | 1.51% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FGHMX vs. FZROX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FGHMX drawdown since its inception was -48.03%, which is greater than FZROX's maximum drawdown of -34.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGHMX and FZROX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FGHMX | FZROX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.03% | -34.96% | -13.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.05% | -12.44% | -4.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.03% | -25.12% | -22.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.15% | -6.16% | -6.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.39% | -5.61% | -5.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.54% | 2.58% | +1.96% |
Volatility
FGHMX vs. FZROX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Communication Services Class C (FGHMX) has a higher volatility of 8.77% compared to Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index Fund (FZROX) at 5.52%. This indicates that FGHMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FZROX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FGHMX | FZROX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.77% | 5.52% | +3.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.56% | 9.81% | +4.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.42% | 18.68% | +4.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.22% | 17.45% | +5.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.05% | 20.28% | +3.77% |