FGDMX vs. FSPGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Communication Services Class A (FGDMX) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX).
FGDMX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 30, 2018. FSPGX is managed by Fidelity.
Performance
FGDMX vs. FSPGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FGDMX vs. FSPGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGDMX Fidelity Advisor Communication Services Class A | -11.75% | 36.36% | 35.46% | 56.40% | -38.47% | 15.63% | 35.07% | 32.77% | -7.41% |
FSPGX Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund | -13.03% | 18.54% | 33.27% | 42.77% | -29.17% | 27.57% | 38.46% | 36.38% | -8.68% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FGDMX achieves a -11.75% return, which is significantly higher than FSPGX's -13.03% return.
FGDMX
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- -11.50%
- YTD
- -11.75%
- 6M
- -9.30%
- 1Y
- 26.83%
- 3Y*
- 28.17%
- 5Y*
- 10.65%
- 10Y*
- —
FSPGX
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- -8.63%
- YTD
- -13.03%
- 6M
- -12.06%
- 1Y
- 14.49%
- 3Y*
- 19.68%
- 5Y*
- 11.91%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FGDMX vs. FSPGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FGDMX has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than FSPGX's 0.04% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FGDMX vs. FSPGX — Risk / Return Rank
FGDMX
FSPGX
FGDMX vs. FSPGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Communication Services Class A (FGDMX) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FGDMX | FSPGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.17 | 0.66 | +0.52 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.73 | 1.10 | +0.63 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.15 | +0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.35 | 0.72 | +0.63 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.16 | 2.51 | +2.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FGDMX | FSPGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.17 | 0.66 | +0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | 0.56 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.68 | 0.78 | -0.10 |
Correlation
The correlation between FGDMX and FSPGX is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FGDMX vs. FSPGX - Dividend Comparison
FGDMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.67%, more than FSPGX's 0.40% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGDMX Fidelity Advisor Communication Services Class A | 8.67% | 7.66% | 6.90% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.73% | 3.76% | 35.47% | 8.84% | 0.00% |
FSPGX Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund | 0.40% | 0.34% | 0.37% | 0.73% | 0.86% | 2.22% | 1.76% | 1.04% | 1.32% | 0.22% |
Drawdowns
FGDMX vs. FSPGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FGDMX drawdown since its inception was -47.60%, which is greater than FSPGX's maximum drawdown of -32.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGDMX and FSPGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FGDMX | FSPGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.60% | -32.66% | -14.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.94% | -16.17% | -0.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.60% | -32.66% | -14.94% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.94% | -16.17% | -0.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.07% | -6.43% | -4.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.42% | 4.63% | -0.21% |
Volatility
FGDMX vs. FSPGX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Communication Services Class A (FGDMX) has a higher volatility of 7.08% compared to Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX) at 5.33%. This indicates that FGDMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSPGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FGDMX | FSPGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.08% | 5.33% | +1.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.79% | 11.79% | +2.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.04% | 22.32% | +0.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.13% | 21.46% | +1.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.00% | 21.63% | +2.37% |