PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FGDMX vs. FSSMX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FGDMX and FSSMX is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.7

Performance

FGDMX vs. FSSMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Communication Services Class A (FGDMX) and Fidelity Stock Selector Mid Cap Fund (FSSMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
16.77%
0.20%
FGDMX
FSSMX

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FGDMX:

1.42

FSSMX:

0.54

Sortino Ratio

FGDMX:

1.89

FSSMX:

0.85

Omega Ratio

FGDMX:

1.25

FSSMX:

1.10

Calmar Ratio

FGDMX:

2.37

FSSMX:

0.47

Martin Ratio

FGDMX:

6.81

FSSMX:

2.07

Ulcer Index

FGDMX:

3.77%

FSSMX:

4.19%

Daily Std Dev

FGDMX:

18.11%

FSSMX:

16.09%

Max Drawdown

FGDMX:

-48.54%

FSSMX:

-50.54%

Current Drawdown

FGDMX:

-3.93%

FSSMX:

-10.13%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGDMX achieves a 6.47% return, which is significantly higher than FSSMX's 0.98% return.


FGDMX

YTD

6.47%

1M

1.84%

6M

16.77%

1Y

24.02%

5Y*

11.73%

10Y*

N/A

FSSMX

YTD

0.98%

1M

-4.47%

6M

0.20%

1Y

7.80%

5Y*

4.38%

10Y*

3.42%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FGDMX vs. FSSMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGDMX has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than FSSMX's 0.79% expense ratio.


FGDMX
Fidelity Advisor Communication Services Class A
Expense ratio chart for FGDMX: current value at 1.03% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%1.03%
Expense ratio chart for FSSMX: current value at 0.79% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.79%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FGDMX vs. FSSMX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGDMX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FGDMX is 7575
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FGDMX is 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FGDMX is 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FGDMX is 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FGDMX is 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FGDMX is 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

FSSMX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FSSMX is 2929
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FSSMX is 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FSSMX is 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FSSMX is 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FSSMX is 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FSSMX is 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FGDMX vs. FSSMX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Communication Services Class A (FGDMX) and Fidelity Stock Selector Mid Cap Fund (FSSMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FGDMX, currently valued at 1.42, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.001.420.54
The chart of Sortino ratio for FGDMX, currently valued at 1.89, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.001.890.85
The chart of Omega ratio for FGDMX, currently valued at 1.25, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.251.10
The chart of Calmar ratio for FGDMX, currently valued at 2.37, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.002.370.47
The chart of Martin ratio for FGDMX, currently valued at 6.81, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.006.812.07
FGDMX
FSSMX

The current FGDMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is higher than the FSSMX Sharpe Ratio of 0.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGDMX and FSSMX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.501.001.502.002.50SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
1.42
0.54
FGDMX
FSSMX

Dividends

FGDMX vs. FSSMX - Dividend Comparison

FGDMX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FSSMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FGDMX
Fidelity Advisor Communication Services Class A
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.20%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FSSMX
Fidelity Stock Selector Mid Cap Fund
0.56%0.57%0.78%0.77%0.72%1.02%0.65%1.06%0.49%0.73%0.58%0.30%

Drawdowns

FGDMX vs. FSSMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGDMX drawdown since its inception was -48.54%, roughly equal to the maximum FSSMX drawdown of -50.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGDMX and FSSMX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-3.93%
-10.13%
FGDMX
FSSMX

Volatility

FGDMX vs. FSSMX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Communication Services Class A (FGDMX) and Fidelity Stock Selector Mid Cap Fund (FSSMX) have volatilities of 4.27% and 4.43%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
4.27%
4.43%
FGDMX
FSSMX
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab