PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FGDKX vs. BPTRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FGDKX vs. BPTRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Growth Discovery Fund Class K (FGDKX) and Baron Partners Fund (BPTRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGDKX achieves a 14.34% return, which is significantly higher than BPTRX's -1.17% return. Over the past 10 years, FGDKX has underperformed BPTRX with an annualized return of 19.11%, while BPTRX has yielded a comparatively higher 23.95% annualized return.


FGDKX

1D
-0.99%
1M
5.61%
YTD
14.34%
6M
13.49%
1Y
29.40%
3Y*
25.21%
5Y*
14.67%
10Y*
19.11%

BPTRX

1D
-0.98%
1M
4.39%
YTD
-1.17%
6M
18.45%
1Y
31.97%
3Y*
22.44%
5Y*
12.59%
10Y*
23.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGDKX vs. BPTRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FGDKX
Fidelity Growth Discovery Fund Class K
14.34%15.23%30.30%35.73%-24.34%23.03%43.54%33.91%-0.20%34.68%
BPTRX
Baron Partners Fund
-1.17%24.54%32.75%43.09%-42.53%31.35%148.81%44.99%-2.01%31.54%

Correlation

The correlation between FGDKX and BPTRX is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2008

0.79

Over the past year, the correlation between FGDKX and BPTRX has dropped to 0.48 - well below their long-term average of 0.79, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FGDKX vs. BPTRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGDKX
FGDKX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
FGDKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGDKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGDKX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
FGDKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGDKX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

BPTRX
BPTRX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
BPTRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BPTRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
BPTRX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
BPTRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
BPTRX Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGDKX vs. BPTRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Growth Discovery Fund Class K (FGDKX) and Baron Partners Fund (BPTRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FGDKXBPTRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.27

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.42

2.86

-0.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.25

6.97

+2.28

FGDKX vs. BPTRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGDKX Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is higher than the BPTRX Sharpe Ratio of 1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGDKX and BPTRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FGDKXBPTRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.85

1.11

+0.74

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

0.38

+0.35

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

0.74

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.55

+0.08

Drawdowns

FGDKX vs. BPTRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGDKX drawdown since its inception was -55.39%, smaller than the maximum BPTRX drawdown of -64.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGDKX and BPTRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FGDKXBPTRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.39%

-64.11%

+8.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.51%

-10.71%

-1.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.41%

-33.34%

+9.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.75%

-49.87%

+20.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.09%

-51.26%

+20.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.99%

-4.57%

+3.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.67%

-13.78%

+5.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.27%

4.42%

-1.15%

Volatility

FGDKX vs. BPTRX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Growth Discovery Fund Class K (FGDKX) has a higher volatility of 4.36% compared to Baron Partners Fund (BPTRX) at 3.59%. This indicates that FGDKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BPTRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FGDKXBPTRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.36%

3.59%

+0.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.75%

21.25%

-8.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.38%

27.59%

-11.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.37%

33.61%

-13.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.60%

32.69%

-12.09%

FGDKX vs. BPTRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGDKX has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than BPTRX's 1.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

FGDKX vs. BPTRX - Dividend Comparison

FGDKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%, less than BPTRX's 3.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BPTRX
Baron Partners Fund
3.40%3.36%0.76%0.00%3.19%7.72%3.67%0.26%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.35%
FGDKX
Fidelity Growth Discovery Fund Class K
1.44%1.65%12.82%2.63%3.69%13.53%9.71%4.37%5.13%4.92%0.15%0.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


FGDKX and BPTRX have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FGDKX has higher volatility (4.36%) compared to BPTRX (3.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGDKX dropped -55.39% vs BPTRX's -64.11%.

FGDKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FGDKX and BPTRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer