FGDDX vs. YFSIX
FGDDX (Fidelity Advisor Dividend Growth Fund Class A) and YFSIX (AMG Yacktman Global Fund) are both mutual funds - FGDDX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity, while YFSIX is a Global Equities fund managed by AMG. Their 0.64 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FGDDX charges 1.16%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for YFSIX.
Performance
FGDDX vs. YFSIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FGDDX
- 1D
- 2.02%
- 1M
- -0.06%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
YFSIX
- 1D
- 3.06%
- 1M
- 4.28%
- 6M
- 14.11%
- YTD
- 24.97%
- 1Y
- 22.32%
- 3Y*
- 15.02%
- 5Y*
- 9.02%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 12.76%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
FGDDX vs. YFSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
FGDDX Fidelity Advisor Dividend Growth Fund Class A | 13.28% |
YFSIX AMG Yacktman Global Fund | 14.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between FGDDX and YFSIX is 0.64, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 16, 2026 | 0.64 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FGDDX vs. YFSIX — Risk / Return Rank
FGDDX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
YFSIX
FGDDX vs. YFSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Dividend Growth Fund Class A (FGDDX) and AMG Yacktman Global Fund (YFSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FGDDX | YFSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.22 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.41 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 4.10 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FGDDX vs. YFSIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FGDDX drawdown since its inception was -5.73%, smaller than the maximum YFSIX drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGDDX and YFSIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FGDDX | YFSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.73% | -35.10% | +29.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.20% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.20% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.14% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.65% | -2.55% | -0.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.53% | -4.89% | +3.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.86% | — |
Volatility
FGDDX vs. YFSIX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FGDDX | YFSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.69% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 15.90% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.56% | 22.66% | -5.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.56% | 15.78% | +1.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.56% | 16.36% | +1.20% |
FGDDX vs. YFSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FGDDX has a 1.16% expense ratio, which is higher than YFSIX's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
FGDDX vs. YFSIX - Dividend Comparison
FGDDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%, while YFSIX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGDDX Fidelity Advisor Dividend Growth Fund Class A | 0.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
YFSIX AMG Yacktman Global Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 8.68% | 8.02% | 4.32% | 8.18% | 4.76% | 6.59% | 0.71% | 2.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FGDDX and YFSIX have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for FGDDX and YFSIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer