FGDDX vs. FBGRX
FGDDX (Fidelity Advisor Dividend Growth Fund Class A) and FBGRX (Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - FGDDX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity, while FBGRX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FGDDX charges 1.16%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for FBGRX.
Performance
FGDDX vs. FBGRX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FGDDX
- 1D
- 1.72%
- 1M
- 3.25%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FBGRX
- 1D
- 2.03%
- 1M
- 4.78%
- YTD
- 19.05%
- 6M
- 18.64%
- 1Y
- 44.33%
- 3Y*
- 31.24%
- 5Y*
- 16.32%
- 10Y*
- 22.23%
FGDDX vs. FBGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
FGDDX Fidelity Advisor Dividend Growth Fund Class A | 16.36% |
FBGRX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund | 25.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between FGDDX and FBGRX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 16, 2026 | 0.90 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FGDDX vs. FBGRX — Risk / Return Rank
FGDDX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FBGRX
FGDDX vs. FBGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Dividend Growth Fund Class A (FGDDX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FGDDX | FBGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.40 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.46 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 14.31 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FGDDX vs. FBGRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FGDDX drawdown since its inception was -5.73%, smaller than the maximum FBGRX drawdown of -58.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGDDX and FBGRX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FGDDX | FBGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.73% | -58.64% | +52.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -12.65% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -27.07% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -43.08% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -43.08% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.34% | +0.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.14% | -12.52% | +11.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.06% | — |
Volatility
FGDDX vs. FBGRX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FGDDX | FBGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.86% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 14.72% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.50% | 18.71% | -0.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.50% | 25.07% | -6.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.50% | 23.78% | -5.28% |
FGDDX vs. FBGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FGDDX has a 1.16% expense ratio, which is higher than FBGRX's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
FGDDX vs. FBGRX - Dividend Comparison
FGDDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%, less than FBGRX's 1.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBGRX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund | 1.60% | 1.90% | 5.95% | 0.93% | 0.57% | 8.73% | 6.40% | 3.70% | 6.32% | 4.23% | 4.05% | 5.30% |
FGDDX Fidelity Advisor Dividend Growth Fund Class A | 0.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, FGDDX and FBGRX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
Find the right allocation for FGDDX and FBGRX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer