FGBFX vs. TPINX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

FGBFX (Fidelity Global Credit Fund) and TPINX (Templeton Global Bond Fund) are both Global Bonds funds. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FGBFX charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.94%/yr for TPINX.

Performance

FGBFX vs. TPINX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Global Credit Fund (FGBFX) and Templeton Global Bond Fund (TPINX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

FGBFX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TPINX

• 1D: -0.70%
• 1M: -0.53%
• YTD: 1.43%
• 6M: 1.49%
• 1Y: 5.59%
• 3Y*: 2.09%
• 5Y*: -1.02%
• 10Y*: 0.22%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGBFX vs. TPINX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FGBFX Fidelity Global Credit Fund	0.00%	7.82%	8.41%	7.14%	-19.74%	-0.53%	8.25%	14.65%	-2.82%	8.90%
TPINX Templeton Global Bond Fund	1.43%	15.02%	-11.95%	2.45%	-6.17%	-5.06%	-4.41%	0.63%	1.26%	2.36%

Correlation

The correlation between FGBFX and TPINX is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.31
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.50
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.44
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.17
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2012	0.10

Over the past year, FGBFX and TPINX have become more correlated (0.31) than their long-term average of 0.10, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

FGBFX vs. TPINX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TPINX

TPINX Risk / Return Rank: 11
TPINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
TPINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
TPINX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
TPINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
TPINX Martin Ratio Rank: 11

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGBFX vs. TPINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Global Credit Fund (FGBFX) and Templeton Global Bond Fund (TPINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FGBFX	TPINX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.86	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.13	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.03	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.77	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	FGBFX	TPINX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-26.45%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-6.36%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-13.03%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-19.15%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-26.45%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-13.66%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-4.84%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.94%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FGBFX	TPINX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.23%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	5.97%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	7.25%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	8.13%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	7.27%	—

FGBFX vs. TPINX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGBFX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than TPINX's 0.94% expense ratio.

Dividends

FGBFX vs. TPINX - Dividend Comparison

FGBFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.86%, less than TPINX's 5.06% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FGBFX Fidelity Global Credit Fund	1.86%	3.04%	3.68%	3.69%	6.53%	2.53%	3.69%	3.73%	2.67%	1.98%	2.98%	2.72%
TPINX Templeton Global Bond Fund	5.06%	4.29%	5.77%	3.87%	5.17%	5.38%	4.59%	6.12%	6.53%	3.34%	2.33%	3.11%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FGBFX and TPINX in my portfolio?

FGBFX and TPINX have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.