FGBFX vs. EELDX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

FGBFX (Fidelity Global Credit Fund) and EELDX (Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund) are both mutual funds - FGBFX is a Global Bonds fund managed by Fidelity, while EELDX is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund managed by Eaton Vance. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FGBFX charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for EELDX.

Performance

FGBFX vs. EELDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Global Credit Fund (FGBFX) and Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund (EELDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

FGBFX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EELDX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.78%
• YTD: 6.66%
• 6M: 8.02%
• 1Y: 18.98%
• 3Y*: 15.14%
• 5Y*: 8.09%
• 10Y*: 7.99%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGBFX vs. EELDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FGBFX Fidelity Global Credit Fund	0.00%	7.82%	8.41%	7.14%	-19.74%	-0.53%	8.25%	14.65%	-2.82%	8.90%
EELDX Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund	6.66%	15.80%	14.87%	11.46%	-6.14%	1.55%	7.44%	18.34%	-4.27%	13.05%

Correlation

The correlation between FGBFX and EELDX is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.00
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.06
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.06
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.06
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2014	0.09

Return for Risk

FGBFX vs. EELDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EELDX

EELDX Risk / Return Rank: 97
EELDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
EELDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
EELDX Omega Ratio Rank: 98
EELDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
EELDX Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGBFX vs. EELDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Global Credit Fund (FGBFX) and Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund (EELDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FGBFX	EELDX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	5.55	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.76	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	1.69	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	1.39	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	FGBFX	EELDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-19.12%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-3.68%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-3.98%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-17.35%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-19.12%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	0.00%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-2.90%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.90%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FGBFX	EELDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.60%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	3.03%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	3.46%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	4.61%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	4.74%	—

FGBFX vs. EELDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGBFX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than EELDX's 0.78% expense ratio.

Dividends

FGBFX vs. EELDX - Dividend Comparison

FGBFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.86%, less than EELDX's 10.78% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EELDX Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund	10.78%	9.44%	8.58%	9.02%	9.17%	7.87%	7.71%	7.86%	8.16%	7.90%	4.12%	1.65%
FGBFX Fidelity Global Credit Fund	1.86%	3.04%	3.68%	3.69%	6.53%	2.53%	3.69%	3.73%	2.67%	1.98%	2.98%	2.72%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FGBFX and EELDX in my portfolio?

FGBFX and EELDX have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.